1,129 karma · joined December 3, 2014
LFR, LFG, bonus loot rolls, facebook minigame of garrison management, Bind on Account for all pets, mounts and Heirlooms.. Heirlooms themselves.
It is definitely far more casual than it used to be. I'm not going to whine, I understand the game needs to play to the market and I'm not going to pretend I enjoyed having to find a group in a chat channel, run to the actual instance and then grind away about an hour for resurrecting and loot squabbles that existed before LFG and Personal Loot, some of the changes are great. I suppose I'm also older and 'wiser' now (At least busier, with a 9-5 and whatnot), so this new style of WoW suits me, I can't just stay up all night playing like I used to.
Bit ironic too that this was one of the papers caught up in the phone hacking scandal and they are now preaching about security.
I have a dedicated Linux server from Kimsufi which runs any testing I need to do for my work and also has a BitTorrent Sync client installed. I have Sync installed on my phone, laptop and work computer, so anything I need to share I can, easily and quickly.
I guess this whole droneswarm idea is just a natural continuation of older drone tech really.
Do you have proof..?
I was thinking this piece of software would scrape the Active Directory for names, feed it into an SQL database and then through SharePoint (I only say SharePoint because that's what our Intranet is based on), you could host static Visio-based floor plans of just the desk-spaces.
You could then link the SQL database to the live Visio floorplans and then move the users around as needed on the page, making them up to date for the whole office as soon as one person updates it, rather than having to email the whole office with the updated document, wasting time and effort, as as soon as any personnel changes are made, the document has to be manually re-edited with names and whatnot from scratch.
Thanks for clearing that up, good luck with your site!
I had a conversation with my SO with regards to the destruction without mentioning my view on why it affects us so much more and she pretty much came to the same conclusion.
I like the idea, bit wary about trusting a random website with my personal history (Linkedin took me long enough to join), but without full functionality I didn't spend more than a minute playing around with this.
^ Clickthrough to the actual article.
God Damnit Hugo, Get your shit together!
Kinda the basic principle behind FOS as I understand it.
I just browse the plex app for stuff I wanna watch, click cast and then voila! On demand TV and films, wirelessly, without having to move my arse off the couch.
What a time to be alive.
I'm actually downloading UE4 as I type this, I'm going to have a play around with importing AutoCad maps and then demo to the Directors, in an effort to show them how visually impressive UE4 could be as opposed to dry meetings with clients showing them floor plans. It's quite a rare skill to be able to properly visualize projects in 3d from floor plans, and I've often seen clients going cross eyed in attempts to hold all the info in their head at once.
There's just no legitimate reason to increase surveillance powers even more. This is a weak, weak argument.
Ontopic though, this could actually be a good way to educate people on the dangers of sharing. Only 5 mins in myself so far though.
For example, you state that handing over data about Chilean users may result in them being murdered. I could just as easily argue that if you didn't hand over the data, Chilean users may be murdered. I'm not saying they will be or anything like that, obviously.
Compared to your last point, which is rooted in solid fact (They were both monitored, it did nothing to prevent the attack) and can't be argued with, the other two are a bit.. flimsy.
All I'm saying is if I was arguing against you (Which I'm not), it'd be easy to call you hysterical when you go on about murder and the Chinese.
For clarity, ignored your first point because not US and second point is sound, so I left that out as well :)
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_disclosure_law#United_Kingd...
The others are a bit too straw-man (Do you support Chinese interception against their adversaries? Are you happy to turn over your entire email history on entering a country?)
Not that I'm saying you're wrong, you're completely right. It's just that we need non-emotive and cool heads when we argue this.
I think it sums this up quite well. Just dumping data and statistics doesn't make a government transparent. Being open and answering direct questions with direct answers (MP expenses, Iraq Dossier, Rochdale scandal, Allegations of a Westminster Paedophile ring etc), rather than half-answering or outright delaying reports and inquiries until people forget about them or the general election has passed and the current government are safe in their seats for another 4 years would make them transparent.