Nextcloud CEO Frank Karlitschek well summarized it:
“I don't think Gaia-X has a future. It's basically a paper monster that will exist but will not have any impact in the market, unfortunately."
315 karma · joined March 12, 2015
Nextcloud CEO Frank Karlitschek well summarized it:
“I don't think Gaia-X has a future. It's basically a paper monster that will exist but will not have any impact in the market, unfortunately."
The Domain Name you have entered is not available. It has been taken down as a result of dispute resolution proceedings pursuant to the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS).
The fritz.box name servers also point to URS[2] name servers:
Name Server: ursns1.viagenie.ca
Name Server: ursns2.viagenie.ca
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20240305162200/https://fritz.box...>> Looks like that Homebrew users (both macOS and Linux, both Intel and ARM) are unlikely affected?
> Correct. Though we do not appear to be affected, this revert was done out of an abundance of caution.
As long as the private key is stored/handled safely and RSA/ECC is not broken, it is not vulnerable.
I do agree that key rotation is better/recommended practice.
> a single leaked private key means your entire site is compromised
The leak is the actual vulnerability. As long as the leak is still there and you are not aware of the compromised private key, a fresh new private key will probably leak again.
However, the chances of leaking may be greater if a private key has to be used in multiple locations.
Then it is interesting that, with gold being less valuable nowdays than fiat money, central banks (or countries) are still the largest buyers of gold.
For normal internet browsing the single ISDN connection (64 kbps) was enough. Then later in 1999, Napster[2] launched and I was hooked! This made me use bundling ISDN channels quite a lot. Because of the cheaper tariffs, weekends where great because I enabled the bundling around midnight until early in the morning, so my parents wouldn't notice. :-)
I was on ISDN until 2002, when ADSL was available here and we could be online 24/7 for a fixed price. I do remember my ISP (XS4ALL) still had a fair-use-policy for downloading, which they removed a few years later.
[1] https://www.acm.nl/en/publications/publication/9213/OPTA-agr...
Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1980994/000143774923...
Those who believe it can not work are most probably not invested. Those who believe it can work are most probably invested.
If Bitcoin would be used as a store of value instead of gold, gold can be used for other material purposes for a lower price. The same goes for real estate. A house does not have to be an investment asset or store of value. If (institutional) investors would use Bitcoin instead of housing, it could make housing affordable again. Or at least result in more fair/realistic housing market instead of the propped up market from the last few years.
Compared to gold and real estate, Bitcoin is a scarce asset that can easily be divided into small pieces. It has a liquid market and can be exchanged 24/7 anywhere in the world.
Does every layperson have to adopt stocks or commodities? Are these also dead if a layperson does not adopt it?
[1] https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/98423
[2] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Seed_phrase#Two-factor_seed_phras...
A very cool PostgreSQL feature is that, if you install a second instance on the same server, it will by default use a different path and port to run the second instance.
root@example:~# pg_lsclusters
Ver Cluster Port Status Owner Data directory Log file
11 main 5432 online postgres /var/lib/postgresql/11/main /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-11-main.log
14 main 5433 online postgres /var/lib/postgresql/14/main /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-14-main.log
Now you can dump and import databases on the second instance and test your applications with the new version. If it all works as expected, use pg_upgrade[1] to migrate everything to the new instance and switch the ports after the migration.I have only done this migration process on Debian systems but in my experience it worked fantastic!
Wrong.
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is a fork of Bitcoin (BTC). Bitcoin Cash is a spin-off or altcoin that was created in 2017.
hatop -s /var/run/haproxy/example.sock
Use the arrows to select a backend server and press: F9 - Enable a backend server (Status: UP)
F10 - Disable a backend server (Status: MAINTENANCE)
For Apple keyboards it is fn+F9 and fn+F10.I hope they’ll continue with this type of ‘unlimited’ tickes. If only during peak summer/winter months. I guess a lot of people would gladly pay more for such unlimited (no worry) tickets.
I'm glad that there are still people who understand this. In the Netherlands 90% of the homes[1] still run on natural gas and that's not something we can "simply" replace. It is possible and will eventually happen but it will take years if not decades.
And that's just homes in the Netherlands. Take a look at the global energy mix[2] how much the world still depends on gas.
[1] https://www-cbs-nl.translate.goog/nl-nl/nieuws/2021/07/92-pr...
Below a graph from the Dutch TTF Gas Futures from the past 2 years. The contract price is in Euros and Euro cents per MWh.
https://www.theice.com/products/27996665/Dutch-TTF-Gas-Futur...
Edit: those are just numbers on a screen but in real life that means the energy/gas bill increases between 5x - 10x if this continues.
If I may add: the score produced by Vangelis.
https://help.coinbase.com/en/coinbase/trading-and-funding/se...
Related to this:
In 2020 the Netherlands approved the implementation for the European fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD5). Crypto providers operating in or from the Netherlands also needed to apply for registration with the Dutch Central Bank (DNB). Besides the AMLD5 implementation DNB required from crypto providers to implement additional measures, which is the same wallet verification that Coinbase now requires.
Bitonic (a dutch crypto broker/provider) filed a lawsuit against DNB regarding the additional wallet verification requirement, which was not part of AMLD5. DNB formally acknowledged the complaints from Bitonic and revoked the wallet verification. I'm not sure but I believe (until now) it has only be revoked for Bitonic.
Bitonic published some articles on their site:
https://bitonic.nl/en/news/206/dutch-amld5-implementation-la...
https://bitonic.nl/en/news/224/lawsuit-bitonic-vs-dutch-cent...
https://bitonic.nl/en/news/231/dnb-formally-acknowledges-com...
Exactly. This is a problem. It can be so advanced that almost nobody understands it.
Now take a look at how advanced Bitcoin is:
Total circulation will be 21,000,000 coins. It'll be distributed
to network nodes when they make blocks, with the amount cut in half
every 4 years.
first 4 years: 10,500,000 coins
next 4 years: 5,250,000 coins
next 4 years: 2,625,000 coins
next 4 years: 1,312,500 coins
etc...
When that runs out, the system can support transaction fees if
needed. It's based on open market competition, and there will
probably always be nodes willing to process transactions for free.
Satoshi NakamotoIn theory everything is possible. I do not follow the beating really. They can both exist with different use cases.
Bitcoin wants to be digital gold (and money) and Ethereum wants to be a smart contract world computer running dapps. They solve different problems.
What you and many others seem to overlook is first mover advantage, network effects and most important: trust. Bitcoin is not Yahoo or Facebook, it is not a company product which has to improve and break things all the time.
In the long run Bitcoin is a store of value. That requires trust, which takes time. To gain trust over time it has to move slow and steady because there can be no mistakes.
When it comes to money and trust it is almost impossible to get a second chance (see Terra UST). Just one mistake could result in everyone distrusting Bitcoin.
For production I always use the Nginx stable releases.
My very humble assessment is that it is worth nothing. It is based on nothing, there is no underlying assets to act as an anchor of safety.
It is however not possible to send physical gold over the internet. Gold is also difficult to verify. You'll probably need to rely on a broker/shop and their tools to test if it's real. Bitcoin is relatively easy to verify with software anyone can download for free.
Is a license also required if the x265 codec is used? Or does that depend on whether the software is for commercial use?
A few years ago I discovered WireGuard and I was really amazed how easy it was to setup a tunnel. Especially if you've dealt with IPsec before. It felt as easy as creating an SSH tunnel between two servers, with only 4 or 5 lines of code in a config on both sides.
Then last year I discovered Tailscale and I was blown away! How did this even work[1] without opening ports in the firewall? And how cool is it that I no longer have overlapping addresses[2] from other networks. Within 15 minutes I had my own mesh network between my Mac, iPhone, Raspberry Pi and other servers. Fantastic!
I'm on the Personal/Free plan but if this would no longer be free, I would be happy to pay for this service (shut up and take my money).