175 karma · joined May 30, 2018
Senator Anthony J. Portantino (Chair)
Senator Patricia C. Bates (Vice Chair)
Senator Steven Bradford
Senator Brian W. Jones
Senator Sydney Kamlager
Senator John Laird
Senator Bob WieckowskiWho says the computer doesn't understand Chinese, though? In this case "the computer" is the system. The program, being the code, isn't a process. The man is acting as a mechanical piece of hardware. But the computer running the program is an active process with state.
I heard a lecture by Searle on this. He mentioned the idea that "the room understands Chinese" and simply dismissed it as absurd without considering it. This is exactly the problem with his argument. Well, that and the casual conflation of the man with the computer as if the CPU hardware is the system.
Heck, not long ago you'd find a lot of humans saying this about other humans.
This is pretty minor nitpicking overall, but the middle of the day can feel a little harsh for these reasons. The landscapes also get dried out.
This is more noticeable in the south bay than SF and thereabouts
Trek has its moments, but it's just more boring. A lot of talky talky and slow and/or repetitive sequences. Even if it's more intellectually interesting as a whole, story-wise.
Even Star Wars was kind of slow by modern standards but the audiovisual design was just monumental.
I used to use aeropress but the rubber plunger degrades and builds up grime, I also find pourover more fun to use.
Having a source of hot water ready to go makes it even easier.
Also there doesn't seem to be any need to worry about sealing the filters as the author's experiments showed, and because the stuff you're filtering is already floating around. It would matter in a vacuum cleaner or some such pollutant-kicking stream.
I don't believe it. They could easily expand their hiring if they were sufficiently motivated. There is a combination of mismatched incentives at the team level and inefficient interviewing processes and requirements.
It's often in the interest of employees to be inefficient in this regard.
Is this part of the misdirection? Both sides do not want to know. Or let's say powerful interests on both sides.
This is not a strong argument.
Regardless of all these wild pontifications, those who have run interference on the truth need to suffer the reputational consequences.
The basic premise of minds as being independent from physical brains is desperate fantasy in any case.
My own mother had a dismissive attitude towards dietary intolerances and even basic hygiene sometimes.
I actually think Windows/MacOS should build the most commonly used sleep-gating functionality into the OS. (On Windows there's Coffee and Milk, where Coffee helps you keep it awake and Milk helps you figure out why it doesn't sleep. Seems like basic modern OS stuff to me.)
This isn't quite correct. AMD and Nvidia have made custom SOCs for game consoles for years now; they could create customized SOCs for PCs if this was a critical issue. But I don't believe it is. The PC workloads and use cases follow well-known patterns and market segments and you don't really need a lot of different custom accelerators, or be on a single SOC for that matter. Video-related processing has been part of GPUs for many years.
For that matter, making RISC CPUs is not actually a huge obstacle for these guys. (Nvidia does.) Yes even Intel.
The article also seems to entirely omit the M1's heterogenous core strategy, where 4 of the cores are high performance and the other 4 are optimized for power efficiency. A deeper analysis of this and how software manages them would be more interesting.
With a sprawling org like Google I sometimes wonder how you could ever expect the CEO to be fully engaged on all of it. It is probably just impossible. The best companies seem to involve a certain passion and enthusiasm on the part of the CEO.
Science has certainly not "marched past" the issue of life (or health) extension. Knowing that it is related to cancer or whatever does not end the story. That is like saying we now know humans don't have feathers.
Regarding agency, the story the humans have no real choice in the matter because the dragon will kill them all otherwise. Ending aging would be much more valuable than ending war. Wars do not kill billions of people. Of course, it is possible to destroy all life on the planet in a war, but this is orthogonal to solving other problems.
"You are hilariously naive to think about solving one problem when there is another."
It seems that current estimates for this are higher, such as 100 billion in a 2020 article I saw. Anyone have an authoritative scientific source for the best current estimates?
50 billion galaxies (or 100) somehow doesn't actually seem so many. Considering that's on the same scale as the number of people on our tiny space rock. Yes each one has billions of stars inside, but still, we're talking about the entire universe.
Somehow, intuition suggests there must be more "stuff" beyond our observable universe.
One approach to splitting things might look something like this:
government A: education, taxes, social services, abortion, immigration, ...
government B: electoral issues, telecom/internet, mail, privacy, utilities, workplace regulations, ... basically, mundane areas that are more about boring competence and finding smart solutions. Or at the very least, serving the public will more directly.
This way, the boring yet important stuff can be done by B without being drowned out by the divisive stuff in A, where people become polarized into thinking they just need to vote against particular issues and there's no real accountability for the rest of it.
You might think that state-level government provides more accountability by being smaller, and this is true in some way, but for the most part I see the exact same thing happening where state government elections are mostly not providing much accountability in a lot of government domains because they aren't contentious enough to be the deciding factors in elections. But they are still important nevertheless.