39 karma · joined February 26, 2015
This approach also has the added bonus of stopping PHP from accidentally evaluating something inside the strings.
who says this can't happen with law enforcement surveillance?
But I don't agree with your conclusion that they need to be protected. If I want to hammer in a nail and accidentally hit my finger that's not the hammer-manufacturer's fault or responsibility. So why should it be the email-client's fault/responsibility to make sure I don't send my private keys?
If people refuse to learn how to use a hammer they will keep hitting their fingers, if people are refuse to learn how to use their email-client they will keep sending their private keys to bad actors.
Why not just optimize page loading performace?
The point of passive listeners would be to make it easier for developers to not accidentally write shitty code and boost performance on well written code that doesn't have to be blocking the scroll.
You might find that it is even a better option to do _more_ testing and debugging as opposed to cramming yet another pointless feature into already bloated browsers. And as a sibling to my previous comment mentioned: this is ripe with "unpredictability and interoperability issues"
Maybe create a `static js analysis` browser extension for developers to aide them in their endeavours to stop writing shitty code, but don't force that down everybody's throat.
edit: as for the other images: it would be indeed nice to see those.
[1] http://r0k.us/graphics/kodak/ [2] http://r0k.us/graphics/kodak/kodim15.html
Isn't that literally what the TSA lock on luggage is? Granted, I wouldn't regard a suitcase made of bunch of plastic or fabric as very secure against any form of attack, but why do all these arguments against backdoors never mention this? And with the TSA master keys leaked a couple of years ago all it needs is one malicious airport worker to open your bags and sniff your panties, erm, steal your laptop.
I don't understand the love for voluntary infantilism. Why is it such an impossibility to have to learn a system before using it? I don't think anybody here would argue that using a keyboard is too difficult. But couldn't we just back it with machine learning and let that algorithm figure out what we want to type when we just hit random keys?