2,581 karma · joined June 5, 2022
owl@superb-owl.link
But more to your question, I think a great example of corporate self-interest leading to serious crimes is the Ebay stalking scandal: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBay_stalking_scandal
We all had to buy roombas to program. The final exam was getting it to traverse a maze. It seemed so simple! They even gave us the exact dimensions and layout ahead of time. Just hard-code the path, right? Spin the wheels so many rotations, turn 90 degrees, spin some more.
Except the real world is messy, and tiny errors add up quickly. One of the wheels hits a bump, or slips a little on the tile, and suddenly you're way off course. Without some kind of feedback loop to self-correct, everything falls apart.
My excitement for robotics died quickly. I much prefer the perfectly constrained environment of a CPU.
Not to be a pseudo-intellectual, but this confuses partial orderings and total orderings. It makes for a fun discussion, but I hope Paul would agree that there's obviously no "best essay", real or hypothetical.
--Paraphrasing of the Dhammapada
But inevitably, as an application grows in complexity, you start to realize _why_ there's a stack, rather than just a single technology to rule them all. Trying to cram everything into Postgres (or lambdas, or S3, or firebase, or whatever other tech you're trying to consolidate on) starts to get really uncomfortable.
That said, sometimes stretching your existing tech is better than adding another layer to the stack. E.g. using postgres as a message queue has worked very well for me, and is much easier to maintain than having a totally separate message queue.
I think the main takeaway here is that postgres is wildly extensible as databases go, which makes it a really fun technology to build on.
Google has been accused for years of replacing sources with their "One Box"--the big answers at the top of the page, which are usually pulled from or corroborated by search results. They don't want you to leave the search results page (where the ads are).
https://aella.substack.com/p/polyamory-vs-monogamy-how-relat...
Instead, create alternative commands, like alias lsl='ls -lah', and put in the work to make it the default thing you type.
Does it? I'd thought fine-tuning was more like transfer learning, adding highly specific data to the training set (e.g. your internal codebase) rather than actually modifying the architecture.
Einstein in particular made huge strides by thinking in terms of sense impressions, e.g. by using his imagination to take on the perspective of an observer falling off a roof:
> I got the happiest thought of my life in the following form:…for an observer in free-fall from the roof of a house there is…no gravitational field. Namely, if the observer lets go of any bodies, they remain relative to him, in a state of rest or uniform motion, independent of their special chemical or physical nature. The observer, therefore, is justified in interpreting his state as being "at rest."
The emphasis on sense impressions over an appeal to an external reality is something he owes to Mach: https://blog.superb-owl.link/p/church-of-reality-ernst-mach-...
Am I right that everything is stored as-code, and that code and UI live in a 1:1 relationship? Seems like maybe the data and the code are separate?
I would _love_ to see (a) version control built in (i.e. a github integration) and (b) support for testing!
* Original book review: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/your-book-review-progress-a...
* Follow-up part 1: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/does-georgism-work-is-land-...
* Part 2: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/does-georgism-work-part-2-c...
* Part 3: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/does-georgism-work-part-3-c...
The first review is very much worth a read--well written, entertaining, and informative.
https://blog.superb-owl.link/p/contra-ozy-brennan-on-ameliat...
I don't think CSR is going anywhere, mainly thanks to Conway's Law.