3,319 karma · joined March 27, 2012
It probably doesn't work out that way in practice since the karma farming bots may not be that sophisticated, but I think it's a cool idea at least.
My take away from the exercise is that this is not a language for human beings. I was successful in writing it, but it was extremely difficult and frustrating. Part of the frustration is because conceptually what I wanted to accomplish was not difficult, but figuring out how to express it was a nightmare. I am not new to the language, I've been writing C++ since 2009, it was the first language I learned and I've spent nearly every day of my life since then writing at least some C++ code. Even so, I can't say that I truly understand this shit.
I'm hoping cpp2 brings us someplace closer to a language that mere mortals can understand. I don't want the next generation writing C++.
I think Claude has better writing style, and it's refreshing not having to fight with the thing to get it to give me full code snippets. I also hate how difficult it is to get the arrow keys to scroll up or down on chatgpt.
Granted, this is annoying and not a particularly great solution, but it would serve to give you a reminder for when you forget. I don't mean to diminish from your overall point either, it's a valid and good one I think.
Fedora was similarly crazy for making it the default when they did. I remember trying out Fedora around that time, not being aware that Wayland was even a thing. I installed it on my machine, I attempted to login, the screen goes black and then after a second I'm back at the login screen. I ended up installing another distro, not realizing what the problem was.
Wayland is wonderful if your hardware supports it well, but even then it is not without problems and regressions.
I've written an immediate mode GUI for my projects and it's fine for performance. I've written a music player for instance which uses a negligible amount of CPU, it uses slightly more resources than Clementine, my previous music player.
This is logical, but the evidence still points to something environmental causing a major shift in levels of myopia. In one generation the rate of myopia in some countries went from 20% to 80%[0]. This means that it isn't genetic, something environmental must have changed to cause this.
https://www.engadget.com/new-york-right-to-repair-law-kathy-...