344 karma · joined June 6, 2015
My new go to is the Magic Star variety, which has been sold as "Sprank" for the last 3 years at least in the Netherlands. These apples keep amazingly well; they ran out of stock around the summer in the last two years, but I found them delicious year round. I hope that this cultivar does not befall the same fate as the Honeycrisp, which I had the pleasure of tasting 5 years ago.
The author identifies the situation completely accurately and is also able to see that they have no leverage whatsoever to make Harper Collins change their behavior. The fact is that doing a job that you are absolutely passionate about is something to be grateful for, and also something that is in high demand. Combined with the fact that the exact skill set required for this kind of work is currently possessed by a surplus of workers means that any position left by a striker will be rapidly fulfilled by a passionate scab.
I have no doubt that publishers will also readily take advantage of AI to make the pool of available jobs even shallower, which will decrease the viability of this movement even more.
Hypothetical scenarios can be constructed for both methods of power generation (What if Braidwood plant melts down, somehow killing the 5 million people living within a 50 mile radius? What if the Three Gorges Dam busts, inundating an area inhabited by 600 million people?[1]) Either way, it is far from obvious to me that hydro has the superior safety profile, especially when their fatality rates are on the same order of magnitude even when the Banqiao incident is removed[2]*.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20210620174812/https://www.japan... p/opinion/2020/09/01/commentary/world-commentary/big-china-disaster/
[2] https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy
* Sovacool et al. (2016), the source of the data in [2] includes a hydro fatality rate per tWh 2.4x larger than nuclear when Banqiao is included.
Given incidence of dam bursts like the 1975 Banqiao dam failure[1], with an estimate death toll of 26,000 to 240,000 people and flooding of over 12,000 square kilometers, I'm inclined to disagree with this assessment.
Maybe I was wrong for expecting the impossible here, but I was excited to see this specific structure and it appears that there is still work to do. Nevertheless, kudos to Deepmind on their amazing achievement and contributions to the field!
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_wealth_eq...
If there ever was any social responsibility in investing, it would have been providing fluidity into new ventures and making markets efficient by making educated investments. I find this trend worrisome and I think it might be sending incorrect market signals.
This is a good takeaway; even though the fringes of any discussion are generally filled with bad ideas, enabling people to have the discussion is paramount in finding the ideas that turn out to be "diamonds". It also permits us to gauge the quality of ideas that are not good allows us to consider why they are not. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download)
EDIT: I see this has already been suggested, along with a large amount of other source in another comment by daveytea.
This is very certainly true, which is what makes AlphaGo interesting to watch and study. The human mind, even one that has trained on Go for years on end, will still work with abstractions and ideas that do not relate to the game. AlphaGo and other computers lack this attribute, as any and all abstractions they may have learned relate entirely to the game.
Any ideas about the "human perception" of Go they may have gleaned from games that are included in the initial training dataset, I suspect have long been supplanted by novel notions gathered during the phase where the Neural Nets played against themselves. These phases are documented in the AlphaGo blog from Deepmind[1].
I suspect that we may reach "human level intelligence", but that this intelligence will not arise in the same way. That is to say, computers will at some point match us in most tests of intelligence, but the solutions they devise will be completely novel.
[1] https://blog.google/topics/machine-learning/alphago-machine-...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-03/swedish-s...
2014 - "No more fillings as dentists reveal new tooth decay treatment" https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jun/16/fillings-den...
2011 - "An end to the dentist's drill: New painless cavity filler could be on the market in two years" http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2077816/Scared-den...
2004 - "No drilling, no filling in painless dentistry" http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1477044/No-drilling-n...
1998 - "Dental lasers – are they the safest way to fill your cavity?" http://judyforeman.com/columns/dental-lasers-are-they-safest...
You can verify this by looking at the `nb_filters` key in the JSON description of the layer on the left and counting the amount of image maps on the right.