343 karma · joined February 18, 2014
I'm not sure how a democracy is supposed to work, when the people voting are being given bad information on such a massive scale.
There are so many important areas when what people believe and what is true are miles apart.
Their destructiveness can be increased by many factors, such as the type of ground that buildings are on and the depth of the earthquake.
Politicians should be generalists not specialists. What they should do is surround themselves with experts is specific fields, and consider the advice they give.
Unfortunately, in many nations the politicians more frequently listen to the distorted scare and panic the media has created that week and base their policies on that instead.
Seriously. The Manhattan project involved 130,000 people at its peak and lasted four years, and it leaked.
The Apollo program involved 400,000 people at its peak and lasted eleven years.
If a small minority of Leads can prevent people they don't like from joining, it seems like it risks reinforcing bigotry and intolerance.
I think he's slipping from skepticism to cynicism here.
How big is a two megawatt nuclear power source anyway? A quick search showed nuclear power plants are in the hundreds to low thousands of megawatt range, and RTGs are in the tens to hundreds of watt range. I have no idea what something that lies between those two would be.
So if a lot of Methane does get released into the atmosphere, in a couple of decades most of it will have broken down and disappeared.
That's a pretty huge difference.
Surely the point is to not kill people?
So which is more important, recognising potential hazards early, or unwavering attention and superior concentration? Because although I'm pretty sure it's the humans who're ahead at the moment, but I'm not sure it'll always stay that way. Bots may never match humans at a hazard perception test, but if bot reaction, vision and AI gets good enough, they may not need to.
Or would the magma just freeze as it travels through the relatively cool hole?
It's for a German city, but it is the same idea.
Demand is reduced almost by half at night.
Solar not generating power at night is a good thing. Demand for electricity is lower at night, and turning on and off conventional power stations is not ideal. Solar helps level things out, meaning you need fewer conventional power stations to be built and kept in standby.