528 karma · joined April 29, 2014
Sounds a little similar to what happened in the UK, iirc. British Telecom wanted to do a full fibre deployment but the government upheld complaints of it being anti competitive, and now we have to endure copper *DSL being the default national broadband option and all the pitfalls that entails.
Not sure who's right, but if it's not WaPo, then that's some terrible fact checking and kinda invalidates the whole article.
Edit - Chan Zuckerberg is a for profit, that will fund non profits, so WaPo is actually incorrect.
Now it's actually proven they don't give a shit what's happening on their 'platform' and have a frankly absurd response to copyright claims. Given how quickly Youtube will block a video given a content claim, it seems any sort of legal action against Udemy will bring their house of cards down extremely quickly.
Did it a while ago on Facebook, and although I've re-added a good 75% of people on the new profile because I still like to socialise with them, having a few weeks break in between was quite pleasant.
Tesla are not saying their car will now take you from A to B with no intervention. Like GPS navigation, they are right now attempting to take some effort out of driving to make it less stressful.
This one was interesting to me. I thought maybe macminicolo.net might fall foul of this, if they rented out a mac mini to you, but it looks like they instead make you straight-up purchase a mac mini. http://www.macminicolo.net/jvmx_secure_signup.html
I wonder if this term/condition was in previous OSX releases and that's why they went this way, or whether it was a happy accident that they went with users purchasing a mac rather than renting one.
Umair has, I feel, a completely valid point. Twitter is a big open service for snippets of comments. Anonymity is pretty good (excluding privileged access, e.g. law enforcement requests) so it positively encourages any and all participation, even absolute shit talking.
And sadly that kind of thing happens again and again, and twitter took so long to publically appear to address it that it certainly gives the impression it wasn't something they were either anticipating or didn't have a way to easily deal with.
I think his argument is fairly compelling. Unrestrained abuse of a social service will drive people away. The daily vitriol generated by gamergate (on both sides of the argument) is a pretty obvious point of reference. There are a lot of people out there that have zero interest in any sort of meaningful dialogue and why would anyone want to have to sit on the receiving end of that should they find themselves unlucky enough to be caught in those crosshairs?
Gonna quote a post from reddit:
"Facebook does do things honestly & by the book. It just so happens that they have a presence in multiple countries around the world. Due to this Facebook Uk® must pay massive amounts to lease the licenses for software & intellectual property from Facebooks conveniently placed HQ in the lowest tax capitals in the world. Doing so at a price Facebook themselves chooses perhaps based on quarterly earning estimates runs at an amazing cost almost siphoning off all profit. So the resulting entity which owns all the IP / leasing then pays tax in the country it is in on its earnings. Now they may be incorperated in a place with minimal corporation tax & simply keep a post office box there, but I assure you that's entirely the focus of their operations & is absolutely not just in place as a tax avoidance tactic. Now if you dislike this you can absolutely tell them it's unacceptable. I'm sure politicians will be telling them off and using them to get press for .. oh 7-14 days until people move on & forget about it. At which point those same politicians won't change anything which impacts the practices at all."
In some ways, this is exciting - deepening mysteries always provoking further study. But on the flip side, it also makes me ponder the thought that maybe we will never gain true knowledge of the universe. At least, probably not before a very long time passes.
Now he says this is a problem for Angular 1.x because there's no carry-over of knowledge into 2.x, but that's in no-one saying Angular 2 sucks like you are suggesting.
However, it still doesn't mean a huge amount because data caps here in the UK seem pretty restrictive. It costs a small fortune to get a data package that might start to give you a landline-replacement service: A 20GB package is probably going to be £40 a month or more.