Hacker News Reader

Where is this focus about Angular 2 sucking? The author is in fact happy about Angular 2 being a re-write. Read the section under Problem 6, where he calls the proposed complete re-write of Angular courageous and laudable.

Now he says this is a problem for Angular 1.x because there's no carry-over of knowledge into 2.x, but that's in no-one saying Angular 2 sucks like you are suggesting.

View on HN

you're right, that was not the best way to put it. I just saw this which seemed like focusing on negative w/out noting that all his complaints will be addressed.

Not convinced yet? Well, what if we were to tell you that the next major version of Angular will take a scorched earth approach to the existing structure that means it will have zero retro-compatibility with what exists today?

So then why is it under a heading that says Problem 6?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com