sharpneli

There are also cloudy days without much wind, and those are quite harsh during winter.

What should one do then? Just shut everything down?

As for how the HW looks like we already know. Look at Strix Halo as an example. We are just getting bigger and bigger integrated GPUs. Most of the flops on that chip is the GPU part.

I asked if it can generate a voice clip. It said it can’t on the chat.

I asked it where can it make one. It told me to use Audacity to make one myself. I told it that the advertisement said it could.

Now it said yes it can here is a clip and gave me a broken link.

It’s a hilarious joke.

Non competes are good for the big incubent companies, but bad for the economy and the workers.

Everyone wants to get a tech sector like California but insist on having non competition agreements being either valid or conditionally valid meaning there is a gray area that stifles innovation.

If you apply fourier transform 4 times you get your original function back. You can think of it as 90 degree rotation. Inverse transform just rotates it in the opposite direction.

The rotation analog is not even too far fetched as fractional fourier transform allows you to do an arbitrary angle rotation.

Gemini basically forces the current US ethnical representation fashions to every situation regardless of how well it fits.

It really wants to mash the whole world to a very specific US centric view of the world, and calls you bad for trying to avoid it.

Basically with that cycle they can get massive compression ratios. As an example newer Toyotas are at 14:1 ratio with 41% thermal efficiency. That’s close to diesel territory on a gasoline car.

Naturally when you floor it it goes to Otto cycle and efficiency drops.

I limited mine to the same as what the consoles have and it made things quite a bit smoother. You can try adding these to your StarfieldCustom.ini

[General]

uMaxPrimaryJobThreads=8

uMaxSecondaryJobThreads=8

More seriously people need to stop with the Apple comparisons. Unified memory has been a thing for a way longer time. Heck around 2014 AMD had integrated GPUs with not just unified memory but fully unified address spaces with the host. Unified memory in itself happened way before that.

Not to mention that mobiles have always been unified archs. It’s just a design decision.

If some frontend developer would make a demo without using webgl or webgpu that would actually get interesting.

They are good ways to distribute programs for customers but that’s it.

Intel tried with their Larrabee on what happens if they just toss in ton of traditional low performance CPU cores. It failed to perform. It's really hard to beat the modern SIMT style GPUs when it comes to massively parallel computation.

Nowadays X64 has a decent amounts of registers + the HW internally has several times more the registers, so saving one is almost meaningless.

What we are seeing is a hierarchy of processing cores. It's already visible even in the desktop market. Intel has their efficiency cores. Apple has the power and efficiency cores. And the GPU on top. So we already have 3 different stages here, at the top the least amount of cores but the best single threaded performance going all the way down to, let me check how many threads, almost 10000 threads on a flagship consumer GPU running simultaneously right now.

Same applies to their compute stuff. They really really want you to purchase their Pro cards and whatnot, and if you have a consumer card well too bad. Go back to playing games. Whereas with my Nvidia card CUDA runs flawlessly which leads me to doing test projects at home and fixing a bug here and there.

AMD doesn't understand how much of development happens on either home computers or university labs with small budgets which means consumer cards. They seem to think that everything happens using big teams and big money. Even though in reality it's the small developers doing stuff that then drives the purchase of the very lucrative large clusters.

For all of it's downsides NVidia actually understand the grassroots approach. Which is why their stuff just works on consumer stuff too.

>A: Yes, it could. However, the License already defines what will happen to content that has been previously distributed using an earlier version, in Section 9. As a result, even if Wizards made a change you disagreed with, you could continue to use an earlier, acceptable version at your option. In other words, there's no reason for Wizards to ever make a change that the community of people using the Open Gaming License would object to, because the community would just ignore the change anyway.

If it goes to court I bet this quote will be mentioned. They cannot say this and then in small print do the opposite after people have relied on it for two decades.

In reality obviously not. Whenever things like these happen it's interpreted in a way that the big company wins. For you not saying irrevocable doesn't mean it's revocable, but the opposite holds.

Personally I only use python for throwaway scripts. Whatever is written in Python likely won’t work in 10 years anymore. So they’re all lost in time. Whereas I can continue some of my C++ eternity projects and they still work perfectly fine.

However above that is the simple definition, which is that as long as it executes more than a single instruction per clock it's superscalar. Even SIMD is taken as an example of a superscalar CPU.

As for the original claim the ia64 is very much a superscalar CPU. All VLIW designs are superscalar. VLIW can be also thought as OoO superscalar CPU with the reorder buffer and dependency analyzer ripped off and exposing the execution units explicitly in their gory details. Or alternatively we can also say that VLIW already won, we just added a big honking chip on top to JIT compile machine code into VLIW micro-ops.

It very much is superscalar. OoO Superscalar is what you described.