ses1984

Basic sysadmin monitoring techniques from twenty years ago would have worked too.

It’s not about the sound being in the language. It most often happens with loan words that are spelled with a w but make a v sound.

It depends on your region, insurance company, and plan.

There are private options for lots of things in Canada, depending on the province.

Without data on what proportion of people are denied and what the consequences are, this isn’t a good faith argument.

On the flip side, cases that would get care in Canada are denied in the USA by private insurance. Private options are far outside the means of most people.

Make their problem everyone else’s problem.

What do you think people on continent x are going to do if there is water on continent y but not continent x…?

Plenty of people could afford blackberries in 2006. Having uber is nothing like having a driver. A MacBook replaces about $50k out of a million dollar recording studio. The rest if it still costs pretty much a million dollars.

I’m not even sure what my point is.

Being a billionaire was never really about having stuff. It was and is about having power.

> 20 years ago, they had things we would want and could never afford

Like what?

Do they sell tvs like this at Walmart?

https://www.cseed.com/en/indoor-tv/unfolding-tv.html

Netflix is a terrible example, it’s cheap entertainment for the masses. Why would a billionaire watch Netflix when they could get front row and/or box seats to any sporting event or concert in the world and fly there via private jet.

Why would the model bother to check signatures if it doesn’t check tags?

There can be crime without intent, like manslaughter.

If someone invents a new weapon to hurt someone, is the first inflicted injury unprecedented?

The law doesn’t apply to billion dollar corporations.

Something doesn’t make sense here because an electric kettle operating at 120v at less than 10 amps will boil water much faster than the large burner on my stove.

If you’re the only one in the cast who isn’t cgi, it’s basically the same.

Being marginally better than hell is still hell.

I’m just challenging your point that ai doesn’t have source.

Is training code and dataset not source?

It would be fine if they protected property rights if they also protected human rights.

Police actually exist to protect capital. At least in the USA.

They only cost about $100.

No one is saying all programmers lack engineering discipline. It is simply not required for all programmers, even in many situations when it probably should be.

This is my first time seeing any research like this, thanks for the link.

I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm really curious about the limits of what people can hear, what can be taught and what is rare.

The way the sentence is structured implies he is evil either way. He is either (dim witted and evil) or (just evil).

Can you give any examples of people identifying these artifacts in a/b tests?

Who has the best ears? What can they detect?

That’s fake news. I had covid and I was fine.

/s

Not every bit of code is going to be meaningless.

Just 99.999%.

Why not have sub agents talk to a payment service? Sub agents should ultimately be associated with a human or business entity, the human or business entity could provide a single payment service for agents.

The question isn’t whether or not they employed a particular tool, the question is how big of an impact did it have.

Do you want each sub agent to be able to anonymously transact?

KYC is probably particularly important in this space and it should be easily traceable to a human.