True, it’s short-term profits, but that’s all that matters. Nowadays.
172 karma · joined June 30, 2011
True, it’s short-term profits, but that’s all that matters. Nowadays.
That has prevented me from posting what I thought was a clever or cheeky response in case it didn't come across the way I wanted.
---
[1] https://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/06/16/the-failure-state-of-...
That mindset plus a dash of RTO equaled me out the door.
Edit: spelling
Instead they went after burnt-out for-profit veterans who wanted a better life balance and good benefits who'd already made their numbers and needed medical.
I personally believe that "AI" is mostly marketing for the current shiny LLM thing that will end up finding some sort of actual useful niche (or two) once the dust has settled. But for now, it's more of a solution being carpet-bombed for problems, most of them inappropriate IMHO (e.g, replacing HR).
For now there'll be collateral damage as carbon-based lifeforms are displaced, with an inevitable shortage of pesky humans to do cleanup once the limitations of "AI" are realized. Any the humans will probably be contract/gig at half their previous rates to do the cleanup.
I currently use Windows, 10 to be exact, to play games, and in a VM to run an income tax fat app (since the online version is so much more expensive). My game machine cannot upgrade to 11. A mobo upgrade won't be that expensive for the game machine, but instead I'll covert it to a Linux box and run the few games that work on Linux.
I believe my Windows days are over as of, say, October 14 this year.
That only went so far, since piling yet more work onto someone who made an earlier deadline may get them to the point where they don't perform.
Which is why I appreciated a not-for-profit company where they'd actually ask me if I needed more time, since quality was of utmost importance. At that point at that company I knew the codebase, so I'd consistently over-estimate and deliver early, since there was still a chance of hidden impacts/requirements.
Never came back on my radar.
It was wonderful! No carrying around a card deck held together with multiple rubber bands. Of course Someone Official found out we were doing this, so for our last lab I had to punch cards out again.
Other tricks included submitting jobs to the 360 at the other campus, which took less money from your account, but was a little slower.
Except for my Internet-connected bathroom scale. It's been giving me the side-eye for a while now.
Or worse, people don't see turn signals enough to know what they mean, and just adds to the confusion.
You then got ahold of a $3K Apple ][ computer with 32K of memory and integer basic, and the only way to get performance was 6502 assembly programming. A struggle.
Then PCs came along, where nobody ever needed more than 640K memory, so it was a struggle to partition your work to fit it all in, but at least you didn't have to do assembler anymore since there was FORTRAN or Pascal.
And then the barriers lowered even further with GUIs and more memory, but you still had to worry about true multitasking not really being implemented correctly, and your poorly-written program could still hog the cycles. A slightly lower struggle.
And now there is more memory than you know what to do with, unless you are a rocket or climate scientist. And you infrequently have to worry about performance. Code efficiency? Bah!
It's all about the struggle.