219 karma · joined September 9, 2021
these days research comes with a set of politically charged assumptions, for example the definitions of "hate speech" and "misinformation" are different based on which political camp you ask
So giving access to Cambridge Analytica is bad but to some other partisan "think tank" is fine? who would make those decisions?
Greed and free markets make for a healthy society.
As a counter-example see what happened with the Soviet Union, I can tell you first hand that didn’t work very well. Demonizing "bourjois" values of private property and prosperity, while fetishizing the “common good” and all-controlling government made the entire society very unhappy (except for a few fat bureaucrats) and led to its eventual collapse.
And btw this forum is hosted by one of the most prominent venture capitalist firms in Silicon Valley which funds thousands of (promising) capitalists.
That's what America is about, greed, the pursuit of happiness, whatever you call it, everything else is noise.
when a company leaves the headlines it's time to sell.
e.g. that story with a “noose” in the garage or black students writing racist graffiti on campus
Some do it for attention, others for financial gain
https://www.espn.com/racing/nascar/story/_/id/29354447/fbi-s...
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/education/black-student-...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hoax-missouri-school-distri...
Nuclear power is the only hope to stop climate change.
You can never hire enough "fact-checkers" thank God, it's democracy in action.
Since it's published by supposedly reputable academics I think it's a perfect example of misinformation.
More often than not these terms are used by one party to silence & suppress opposing views of another.
Thankfully Zuckerberg doesn't give a damn, one would be hard-pressed to find a better CEO for social media company who can stand up to all this whining.
While scientific reductionism has its limitations (e.g. trying to fully describe the complexity of a single neuron in c.elegans is sort of a rabbit hole) you still have to understand at least some of the basic mechanisms, the "LEGO blocks" of cognition, before talking about such higher level of abstraction, especially when it's so ill-defined.
I think Feynman' definition of "cargo cult science" is appropriate here, where we are trying to explain our perception of reality via superficial "neural correlates", or attaching to it these arbitrary "complexity theories", etc., without understanding the fundamental driving factors, mechanics and constraints of perception, the "why" and "how" first.
I wonder what all the highly paid "ML/AI engineers" are doing.
I can give you a counterexample of Reddit that turned into cesspool with (and may be because of) excessive moderation. Just check their front page with posts celebrating people dying of Covid https://www.reddit.com/r/HermanCainAward/
The assumptions can almost always be traced to some "fact" they believe to be true. And facts are easy to fake.
A good example is this recent Reddit thread based entirely on false "facts" promoted by the media, but believed to be true by significant chunk of the US population https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/px9vr2/bles...
So the debate can often be reduced to something as basic as difference in sources you trust, rather than semantics.
more often than not it's the pain of hearing a different opinion. The "hate speech" label turned into "speech I hate" long time ago.
It's not a database problem but more of a graph search algorithm optimized for particular network topology.
When I hear the woke talk about "cultural appropriation", "colonialism","white privilege", etc., it all sounds very familiar. Only now cultural criticism turned into full-blown cultural indoctrination.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/crypto-trading-hamster-mr-...
The fact Etruscans preserved their language could be either because they fought really well or may be had some diplomatic relations and mutual trade with the “migrants”, or both.
It’s funny we have the names of say Alexander the Great or Genghis but leaders of those long gone civilizations before them are completely unknown. May be they intermarried and the steppe people’ benevolent leader allowed some of the conquered tribes to keep their language, who knows.
Edit: also, talking about LSH, must check out FAISS library https://github.com/facebookresearch/faiss and the current SOTA http://ann-benchmarks.com/
I keep hearing this phrase "we don't know much about the brain" from people who've never opened a neuroscience textbook. And at the same time everyone and their grandma has an idea how to build artificial intelligence.
Now while we do have effective Covid vaccines (at least for some variants of the virus), knowing the exact origin of a major pandemic, either it came from a natural source or a lab, is of major importance for science, medicine and public health.
Arguably we're lucky COVID was not as deadly as some other viral pandemics of the past** and we have to gather as much info as possible on its origin and distribution in order to prevent something like this (or worse) happening in the future.