10,522 karma · joined May 25, 2019
The alternative is leetcode hards in person with rounds of in person interviews.
Only on HN there can be a single pixel that is misplaced or off and it causes ONE person to get upset about it.
This is completely petty. Just stop.
The truth is, the author directed Claude to delete 48K file without proper supervision.
The risk of liability is a social problem that is far more difficult to be solved with technical solutions even with AI.
This makes no sense whatsoever.
We need more, because there will always be far more difficult problems yet to be discovered and solved, and that means, we certainly need expert humans to define and verify them.
If you cannot even explain the problem you are facing, not only you don't understand it, but you certainly would not be able to know if the AI solved your problem correctly.
Sounds more realistic than what this blog post is proposing. Meta also tried releasing a phone, how did that go?
Muse on the other hand is the polished version of what OpenClaw should have been and Meta appears to have given a lot of thought about it more than this blog post.
I don't think we need yet another phone.
This seems to be only thought out after a day of vibe coding apps that no-one uses.
But anyone who got laid off and ran out of their savings would need that extra $5k more than others.
This was announced on X [0] and Bluesky [1] (First post) with that intention.
He knows he would get more reach on those platforms than here.
[0] https://x.com/rocallahan/status/2103368176369324093
[1] https://bsky.app/profile/rocallahan.bsky.social/post/3mwd4u5...
There is no point in being on the extreme end around banning all code generated by AI.
Regardless, there is AI generated code in many repositories on Codeberg anyway.
Apple on the other hand forces you to use Siri and Apple Intelligence regardless.
A single powerful person believing that their ideas sound good on paper, but it is actually rather a dark turn for the worst possible outcome. This is what this article describes.
Just remember, we do not need to create any more Luigis. Such bad ideas like this which involve AI will create even more of them.
Frontier AI companies will purposefully do anything to create such false flags to achieve global regulatory capture to prevent you from using powerful open weight models and to protect their margins.
It is clear why they would reveal the breach now instead of much earlier. So what else are they hiding that they have not told us and will wait until the last minute to get attention of the media?
So there's no need to get upset about that simple joke like the last time, and also complaining about comments being "Reddit-esque" which that breaks the HN guidelines [0].
Lastly, you forgot to tell off another user who made the same joke today. [1]
So since when was such slop submissions allowed?