155 karma · joined February 28, 2018
Cool idea! I see the pain point you are addressing here is friction in the marketplace, rather than simply cost optimisation? Traditionally the use of standard RIs was a pain, due to the inflexibility of moving between instance families. And the fact that the marketplace requires a US bank account which made it a no-go for non-US customers.
However, these problems were addressed first through the use of convertible RIs. Which allow exchange of instance types, but can't be sold on the marketplace (from memory). But, to be honest, they were still a pain to manage. You needed a good cost person, or a good TAM to keep on top of the required conversions. So, secondly, savings plans were introduced. I generally recommend compute savings plans these days, as they are much more set and forget, though I acknowledge provide less discount than standard RIs. My personal opinion is that EC2 based RIs will probably be deprecated by AWS at some point in the future. For this reason I don't think its likely they'll release this automated marketplace as a feature in future.
I work almost exclusively with enterprise customers and see very little use of standard RIs these days, which given the marketplace angle I'm assuming is the only purchase option you are working with? Are you doing zonal or regional scope? But if you can find an angle that means customers can make more efficient use of standard RIs all the power to you, that is a win!
Recommendation wise, the native tools (Cost Explorer and the CUR) can deliver reasonable recommendations that are good enough for most customers. Especially when using more flexible purchase options like compute savings plans the need to be super accurate just isn't there anymore.
The social housing system seemed to be abused when I was there. I had a number of Dutch friends still living in social housing places they'd rented as students on very low incomes, and were still renting 10 years later. For the same 300 euro per month, when they were now earning 6-7000 euro/month. I could never understand why this wasn't means tested continually.
"Carbon capture initiative at the Belchatow thermal power plant PGE signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Alstom in December 2008 for the design and construction of a pilot carbon capture plant (CCP) at the latest unit of the plant.
PGE signed a grant agreement of €180m ($245m) for the installation of carbon capture, transport, and geological storage facilities in May 2010.
The project was expected to be completed by 2015, but canceled in 2013 following environmental opposition to underground storage of carbon.
If completed, it would have captured 1.8 million tonnes of CO2 a year."
I don't understand why there would be opposition to storage of carbon?
[1] https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/projects/belchatow-power-pl...
I work for a large multinational in a country other than America. I put up with additional bureaucracy compared to the life of a freelancer/contractor because I know that A) The company has a high chance of existing in 12 months B) I won't be fired without cause. In exchange the company is provided value in excess of my wage, training and other overhead costs. How is this different?
However do note. Avoid us-east-1 if at all possible. Understand that despite the documentation, service control planes do not operate in isolation between availability zones. If you need higher uptime you need to have cross regional deployments. When AWS says a service is global, it actually means us-east-1 :)