51 karma · joined October 19, 2011
"A manager actively avoids creating situations where their coding is necessary for the success of the project."
I agree with Aditya's article. A CTO must be technical for all the reasons stated. I would add another reason to his list: a CTO must be able to challenge the assumptions, plans, and estimates presented to him/her by the engineering team. Doing so requires technical acumen.
Source: former mid-level technology manager in IT at Disney Parks and Resorts who had a weekly audience with VPs and SVPs.
If I drag an app that has an integrated terminal (e.g., VS Code), could one of my teammates start rooting around in my filesystem?
It wouldn't be too hard to use Slack status to determine a time to do this when the other people sharing are not online/not watching.
"Treat all email responses like SMS text messages, using a set number of letters per response. Since it’s too hard to count letters, we count sentences instead."
My implementation of that approach is to do the following each month:
1. Export all my unfinished todo items older than 6 months.
2. Place that export alongside my other backups.
3. Then delete those items from my todo app.
I deliberately do not look at any of those items during this process, lest I be tempted to dive back into them.That way, I limit my total mental clutter while retaining some peace of mind, since I know that I can get back to those items (I sometimes attach photos, notes, etc. to tasks) if needed. I never do.
This is the entire subject of Seth Godin's _The Dip_. I'm not a huge fan of this breed of books, but if someone is looking for a lesson on this topic, I would having a look at that book. It's very short -- you can read it in under an hour. It provides a decent mental framework for thinking through the question of whether you should continue on your current path, or quit and switch gears.
Given its price point and features, I don't even think it should even be compared to the nano. It combines an MP3 player with the capabilities of fitness watches such as Nike+ Sportwatch and Garmin Forerunner, and I would say it is more of a direct competitor to the latter category.
While the market for dedicated MP3 players is dwindling, they still make a lot of sense for fitness. Yet, Nike+ is too anemic for serious fitness buffs (simplistic web site, captures relatively little data, no GPS). I've seen many fellow runners abandon Nike+ sensors for Garmin Forerunner or similar GPS-enabled products.
I don't think its a nano-killer, but I think it may serve a certain audience much better than the nano does today, and its features demonstrate a much greater sense of purpose than the nano does with its complete stagnation in 2011.