There have been six of them in the last 140 years with respect to influenza. The Spanish Flu pandemic killed 675k (in the USA, like 50 mil worldwide or something wild like that.)
959 karma · joined September 5, 2010
rob+hn@thingerly.com
There have been six of them in the last 140 years with respect to influenza. The Spanish Flu pandemic killed 675k (in the USA, like 50 mil worldwide or something wild like that.)
Apple phones can send texts and communicate with any other phone on any other network and vice versa. They just don't use iMessage to do so. I can't DM my discord friends from my work Slack, for example.
That video received a strike and was flagged as a scam... before I ever even sent it to the client. YT is ridiculous.
So crazy to think about that all being done by hand back then.
I know I didn't make the original claim, I just took issue with the initial reply as I felt like it was removing nuance from the discussion. My reply didn't really add much and I probably shouldn't have made it, so I'll try to add something to the discussion below:
For me, I think, it comes down to whether or not something is presented as an opinion or as fact/truth. There's far too many opinion pieces presented as news these days and a lot of people have trouble processing that.
A headline or claim like "China manufactured this virus as a bio weapon to attack the united states!" at the beginning of a pandemic when no one has any information yet is bad.
Discussing whether or not it could have been a lab leak and whether or not it was manufactured is a different thing, and whether it was or was not an attack are acceptable topics, though, I think.
How you actually enforce this I have no idea and I know it's easy to go down the rabbit hole of "who watches the watchers."
Wanting things to be vetted is not the same thing as saying "everyone has to agree with me."
There's a difference between taking a differing opinion and just spouting outright bullshit and lies.
Maybe there was some implied sarcasm I missed.
Yeah I'm not sure what they're getting at. Isn't Endocannabinoid system just a shortened form of Endogenous Cannabinoid system?
That's how this works, right? Ridiculous.
I didn't see any code, but it sounds like the post was detailing how he marks (manually) which section of his models will have a dither pattern -- basically just masking.
There are a a bunch of posts about it if you go to his blog index, there are only 7 pages so it's easy enough to flip through them, they're all labeled with the DailyDriver name. There might be something in there about the render process.
I got on AIM right around the time it came out, so tail end of high school for me. I had been doing some programming, linux, script kiddy, basic web development stuff for a few years but nothing too serious.
At some point I switched fully to Linux and couldn't use AIM anymore. I found gaim which was AIM-only at the time. I installed that and began using it and eventually ran into some bugs or missing features and decided to begin contributing.
This eventually led to me becoming an official part of the gaim team and, eventually, moving across the country to work and live together at a start-up in Southern California (they hired the team, as well as the lead developer from competing/friend project Everybuddy).
I eventually became lead developer of the project and continued to build out features and a development team. Managing/maintaining a popular open source project was such an impactful moment on my life, especially coming from a small rural town where I never really thought about things like that.
I ended up retiring from the project around the time the naming dispute was happening and the project was becoming Pidgin due, well, due to a few things, mostly burn out and some personal life issues, but was with the project in some fashion for about 9-10 years. Going to linux shows, doing a few interviews, working with and living with my friends, playing with linux / open source software all the time, having gaim-dev meetups, getting paid to do what I love... I was thinking about this a few weeks ago, but that timespan is my fondest. I have so many great memories from then and I wouldn't trade it for anything.
All that because of a chat program.
I mean, I agree with you, but trying to get the entirety of a country to educate themselves in time to do something about it is not really going to work.
During that time of reduced anxiety, I was able to introspect a bit more without external stressors and was able to identify some trauma that led to the depression and anxiety -- something that I wasn't even aware was affecting me.
I really don't know how to actually deal with said trauma, so I'll be going to therapy for that, but I think the lessons I learned and the benefits I gained will stick with me since I'm taking concrete steps to deal with it now that I've identified a problem.
Without the year long pause we all went through I'm not sure I would have had the time to sort through my brain so thoroughly.