There was a github repo but I have not checked it.
edit I see, thats an unaffiliated site that latched onto that, my bad, here's the GH that I should've linked: https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA
959 karma · joined September 5, 2010
rob+hn@thingerly.com
There was a github repo but I have not checked it.
edit I see, thats an unaffiliated site that latched onto that, my bad, here's the GH that I should've linked: https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA
But, I also get Anthropic's side that when they're contributing they don't want their internals leaked. If it had been left at that, that's fine, but having it pretend like it's not AI at all rubs me a little bit the wrong way. Why try to hide it?
I'm still inclined to think people might be overreacting to that bit since it seems to be for anthropic-only to prevent leaking internal info.
But I did read the prompt and it did say hide the fact that you are AI.
You have me thinking about old customer service war stories now, I wanted to share one of the more ridiculous ones. A tornado came through the small town and knocked out the utility lines. Being a dial-up ISP our infrastructure was a bit messed up for a few days. Once it was all squared away we had an angry customer call and yell at us about how we were offline for a few days and how unprofessional it was to not let him know that we were going offline. That he wasn't so much mad we were offline but we should have told him so he could have planned around it. He was yelling so much. I finally just said "sir, next time we schedule a tornado I will be sure to let you know." and he accepted the answer and thanked me. People are so odd.
AT&C1&D2S36=7DT*70,,,5551212
And while everyone won't be able to understand what they're looking at, the community as a whole would benefit from people looking at it an announcing/discussing problematic things they see in the code base.
If an open source project is syphoning data, someone's going to see it and talk about it.
If a closed project is doing it, it's harder / more complicated for that act to be discovered.
Thankfully 95% of the people I interacted with in the community were great and were great, but that other 5% was rough.
They need to do some research into what additional prompt cues they can add for the user automatically to bring the user's prompt quality up.
They can append these to the prompt behind the scenes or provide a second text input of the additional prompt data to allow the user to modify that separately from their initial prompt input.
It might even help the user better understand how styling works with prompts.
You've essentially eliminated (most) people who are deaf and people with speech issues from being able to use your product.
It's a neat idea and the design looks like it could be nice but I can't really get past the first page because I cannot use it (no mic attached to this device and I wouldn't want to grant you permission to it anyway.)
https://i.imgur.com/YDyJa5g.png
(edit: It might be related to hitting slightly awkward terrain?)
(edit 2: Got it on video, though my commentary didn't get recorded for some reason) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7U-qS7P2tI
They didn't charge me anything for that either.
I realize this is just anecdotal, though.