rerx

Gave this a try a few weeks ago (for CLion with Jetbrains Client, IntelliJ for Java might be further of course) and felt it was still quite lacking. Loads of features weren't there yet. Of the top of my head: no way to use my customized keymap, no git blame annotations, fundamental navigation shortcuts missing (jump back, navigate via file structure), no way to attach the debugger to a process, ...

I went back to remote controlling the full-featured IDE via Projector, their earlier approach too remote development. That works extremely well for what it is. Probably the richer Gateway client will catch up in a while, but not quite yet.

> why you'd want to actually carry it around

To get on trains and buses, or to walk up a flight of stairs, ... Why would you get a folding bike if you have no need to ever carry it?

Here they show how to attach your trolley bag to the bike and pull it behind you. I reckon this requires quality wheels on your luggage. https://kwiggle.odoo.com/home-kwiggle-rollkoffer

Besides that you can attach a standard bike pack (e.g. from Ortlieb) to the frame of the Kwiggle or carry a backpack, of course.

I haven't had a chance to try a single-wheel electric vehicle as they are not street legal in Germany. But usually I vastly prefer riding a bike over an electric stand-up scooter. My weight is distributed much better on a bike, making the right more stable. On a scooter I cannot reliably raise one arm to give a turn signal. Not signaling can be quite dangerous on shared roads or narrow paths. I never see anybody else indicate their turns on these scooters, so it's probably not a personal problem. Did any manufacturer figure out a way to put easy to read indicator lights on these?

The other thing is that you actually get some light exercise on a bike. Most people with desk jobs would do well to move their bodies a bit more during their days.

One thing that's nice some times about scooters is being able to stand up tall, rather than get into a slightly hunched up position on a bike. The Kwiggle from the GP allows for quite a unique upright body position. So that may be intriguing.

And the reason for that was not Apple's will, it was EU legislation.

This is big: They introduced a proper protocol for serialization. Finally one will no longer need to make sure on each host to run exactly the same version of Unison _compiled with precisely the same version of the Ocaml compiler_!

Pythran sounds awesome. I've somehow always glossed over it before. That might be due to the name, which made me think it was some Fortran-interop library (and those tend to be old and not what I need)...

Big name US tech companies pay much higher salaries than typical for software engineers in Munich. Just browse https://www.levels.fyi/comp.html?track=Software%20Engineer&c...

Munich is very expensive for German standards. 60k gross is not a lot of money there.

Zurich or SF are still on a different level of course.

Financially poor

Same experience with Raycast and Enpass.

Additionally you can configure apps to be ignored for the clipboard history feature.

A malicious recipient can click the link and exploit that their email is now associated to the account of some other person.

You are right! I misremembered. It's `ps x`.

From `man ps`:

       x      Lift the BSD-style "must have a tty" restriction, which is imposed upon the set of all processes when some BSD-style (without "-") options are used or when the
              ps personality setting is BSD-like.  The set of processes selected in this manner is in addition to the set of processes selected by other means.  An alternate
              description is that this option causes ps to list all processes owned by you (same EUID as ps), or to list all processes when used together with the a option.

Have they fixed the performance issues with non-integer scaling?

I agree that the interface of ps is awful with its two conflicting ways to define options, but `ps u` does show all your processes on Linux. I usually type `ps fux` to get a nice tree. Sadly that's Linux-specific and doesn't work on the Mac.

Which review are you quoting?

The auto keyword in C++ is great because it helps you avoid unintended type conversions in assignments. For that reason it should be used widely IMHO. The downside is that it makes it slightly harder to read code outside of an IDE.

When I click on the submitted link with Chrome on Android, it asks me if I want to redownload "0.pdf". Such a confusing question. If I pick the wrong answer, I end up with some restaurant menu I must have looked at months ago, not what the global poster intended.

So for non-confusing real-world UX I'd recommend extra care with file names if you want to go PDF only.

Thanks for the tip, I haven't tried tig yet. That might actually be useful on remote systems in situations where I don't have access to my personally configured emacs.

In Magit you can easily select arbitrary regions of code to stage (or chunks as you would via the command line). I haven't seen any git interface that is as intuitive for this task.

Yes, I don't think the "Nordic model" is a good final answer. But I am not sure if there are more problems with human trafficking in Sweden than in Germany (of course geography plays a role, too).

> victimless crimes

I am not sure if it is really that clear cut. Germany has pretty liberal laws around prostitution and there are massive problems with human trafficking. Many women do not do the work out of their own volition.

That name has just been burnt into my mind to stand for the Scintilla Text Editor: https://www.scintilla.org/SciTE.html Amazing how this is still getting releases after 20+ years.

If you are not careful, you end up with 1000s of tests that are tightly coupled to your implementation, testing internal details of your systems, not their behavior. They become a massive burden if you decide to refactor a system and change its internal implementation.

Do test-driven development, but consider deleting these internal tests once you have scoped out how your initial implementation should work.

Then these two lines of code move away from the context of the surrounding function. There may also be something specific about how the scrollbar is added in this instance, requiring a very complicated name if you want to convey that.

As long as the surrounding function is not overly complex, I don't see the advantage of having to jump back and forth from mini function to mini function to understand what the code is doing.

Rural, poorer areas of the country?

How about a Renault Twizy?

Yeah, that's exactly the same reasoning. Because it's more convenient you run your notebooks in a dedicated tool. Nteract or Vscode or Pycharm..

It's convenient to directly open a notebook from a browser download or a slack message without having to fire up jupyter in a terminal and navigate it to that temp file.

But C++20 is very different from the dialect supported by an old Watcom compiler. :)