4,376 karma · joined September 4, 2013
Of course, if you want non wysiwyg, then don't use Google docs just use markdown in a text editor or install mediawiki or something.
When you say something is 10% faster, what you mean is it took 10% less time to finish. So 19% is correct.
If you could, then I'd start using your "real computer" halt checker to instantly mine bitcoin or break all cryptography, so let me know when you figure out out.
This is out of date but gives you the idea https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi18/presentation/dalton
For example imagine that it takes exploits, URL editing, or something similar to do it. The question here really is how much effort you really need to put in to get it to happen.
Then there are a few that are great at marketing themselves and can make truly insane money.
The AIs will be creating masterwork art and literature personalized for each person better than anything Shakespeare ever wrote or Michaelangelo ever sculpted, but we'll console ourselves that at least we're _really_ conscious and they're just stochastic parrots.
The question of P vs NP is not whether we haven't determined if we can do a particular computation (either at all or in polynomial time). It's whether a deterministic Turing machine could solve in polynomial time the same class of problems that we _know_ a nondeterministic Turing machine could solve in polynomial time.
Of course, the nondeterministic Turing machine is not a physically realistic model of computation.