529 karma · joined September 21, 2017
Interesting, I have found some references to beans lowering cholesterol but not this stronger statement?
I've read that the link from dietary cholesterol to body cholesterol levels is genetically variable, but that there's no test at present for determining individual risk factors.
Based on these parameters I can judge any food based on whether its fiber and protein can match (or beat) a linear combination of chicken and broccoli. Basically if (2F + P) * 20/3 <= C then it's on the diet. This includes non-fat yogurt, wheat bran, eggplant, and some types of beans.
I totally agree with this sentiment, but I would add: I know a guy who designs hardware for a living, and he gets a huge kick from of writing a little Python script. The thrill is mostly in developing fledgeling skills far from your main wheelhouse.
Right. The idea of downplaying "blame" in corporate culture isn't to conceal where bugs came from; it's to make it more socially acceptable to confess when you've caused a bug, instead of keeping quiet.
"Blame" culture is when people take your transparency and use it to create a scorecard against you, which can quickly become toxic.
Also the distributed Internet (e.g. IPFS) and DIY CPU (as in free FPGA tooling) communities.
Sure, the question is how experimental of a plan can you attempt. In SF 2018: not very. I know people who pooled their money for an experimental space in SF several years ago at $1/sq. foot, and broke even. At 5x or 10x those rates today, this is now a lot harder.
> SV has it's issues for sure, but I wouldn't throw all cities under the bus with it.
My critique is specifically of the negative effects of overcrowding and overcapitalization in the SF Bay Area. By extension this would presumably apply to other places like Manhattan with similar conditions. I'm definitely interested in finding other cities with the networking advantages but that manage to strike a balance with livability. Austin has been mentioned already, although some folks will complain they're headed in the same direction.
Personally I find that innovative ideas can be brought to maturity in places where you can find people to develop them, often in cities. But the germ of the ideas will happen when you have some time and space to yourself. I think there's a happy medium where there's access to people and infrastructure, but not the oppressive overdevelopment of Silicon Valley.
- default lifestyle (for economic reasons) is living in the city / suburbs where walking is often aesthetically unpleasant; humans have an aesthetic response to being in nature.
- again for economic reasons, processed food like bread is the default choice; it's hard for some to afford (in time and money) to get all their calories from fresh vegetables and meats. Again the past is a model (I'm talking about humans' natural diet in the days before food preservation / grain agriculture).
- let's shoot for no smog and no cave lung
- social stratification led directly to mass starvation and poverty (poorest segment of society experiences stress-related declines in longevity)
If we assume that every change that's ever happened is for the better in every way, it blinds us as to how to make improvements.
- eating fresh foods instead of processed starches
- no factories and industrial agriculture producing greenhouse gasses
- social organization based on communal resources and personal autonomy (hunter-gatherers) instead of authoritarianism and hierarchy (settled agricultural governments)
1. Agree that a particular thing happened
2. Express how you felt about that thing happening
3. Explain what your needs are
4. Request the person to do it differently next time
Realize these arguments should really be about getting your own needs met, rather than proving that the other person is objectively wrong because of how they "always" or "almost always" do something.