prvc

>On average, the people you know are more socially successful than the people you don't know.

It depends if "you" refers to a specific person, which it seems to do in context.

Maybe so, but not necessarily true a priori.

How about: incentivize efficient use of resources by making devs use slower computers!

Planning can be implemented (at high computational cost) trivially by generating hidden responses.

New models can be trained to natively query "authoritative" sources of information, such as databases and computer algebra systems.

New models can be used to transform prompts into more effective ones (along the lines of TFA).

Frankly, this shouldn't be necessary. There are so many easy gains to be had in implementing an LLM-based chat app which do not require any theoretical advances compared to what we have now. All that's needed is a bit of elbow grease from the implementers.

>Someone should make a website to track changes

Why not you?

>Ferrero angered fans in 2017 by reducing the amount of cocoa in Nutella

Hazelnut spread was originally invented in response to a shortage of cocoa.

How does this differ from a typical generic cola recipe?

Tl;dr: Apple can remove the X app from its app store (as it can always do to any app). That's what the article's author, Dave Lee, and, presumably, disclaimer notwithstanding, its publisher, Bloomberg, seem to want to happen at least.

Because the terrain is never perfectly uniform, the pattern might not be evident within a small period of time, like one day.

No, just over time.

>The factors that orchestrate their coordinated movements is still a mystery.

I'd propose that the path of the sun biases the mice's movements in the same direction, since the ice in their shadows will be colder.

Also, today is the 30-year anniversary of DOOM's release.

Or for any kind of journalist.

You wouldn't look at a car.

>There's a massive jump in that logic, which is basically equating a large neural net to being exactly the same as a singular human being.

It does not assume that.

If including a copyrighted work in an AI training corpus is theft because of its influence on some artificial neural net, then so is viewing it by a human being, whose memory is now somehow the property of the copyright holder, an absurd conclusion.

If a reference to a brain-uploading & merging with AI scenario, well, that's quite ambitious.

Those two categories are vague and non-exhaustive (and non-exclusive). Also, if the Ghostwriter writes his biography himself (entirely), in most senses of the word, that doesn't mean he "helped" himself to do it. So, no paradox at all there, and certainly not a Russellian one.

Where is the paradox?

If true, would anything about this even be untoward or unusual?

Full NYT obit: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/29/us/henry-kissinger-dead.h...

>X sues Media Matters to silence moderation criticism

Title should be changed to "X sues Media Matters", to eliminate inaccurate editorialization.

Will he be held in custody before sentencing?

Good.

The phenomenon of the migration of upper-middle or middle class (that is, those on the margin of luxury) holders of the beliefs mentioned in TFA from blue to red states is strong evidence of his thesis.

Paid article. Curious what the takeaway is from the paywalled portion.

I assume this is based on a spherical cap's being "close enough" to a paraboloid, for the purposes of this design.

The diversity-industrial-complex reduces the world to bias and oppression.