360 karma · joined January 14, 2011
There is no concept of installing or running programs outside of a login on ChromeOS. There is also only one form of device ownership, and that is device enrollment (which is not what is being described by OP), and the set of policies that are applied to enrolled device. Logging into an account cannot apply device policies.
cps.edu is who's enforcing that while you use a cps.edu account, you have to use their software (only while logged into that account or browser). BYOD devices are still yours and you can remove the account with a press of a button.
The experiment didn't fail, it concluded.
Yes, if you thought that thing you were going to code was antithetical to freedom. Just because you do or don't do something at work doesn't mean it's exempt from ethical scrutiny by either employees or society at large.
Something similar at Google for instance: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/11/27/google-...
and again regarding a military contract: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-alphabet-defense/google-t...
http://www.nytimes.com/1982/12/16/business/new-era-for-the-t...
In fact, some people still lease their phones: https://consumerist.com/2012/04/30/hundreds-of-thousands-of-...
A distant third is Nissan with 5007 miles and 24 disengagements, for 208.6 disengagements/mile.
All others have less than 5000 miles driven and less than 200 miles/disengagement
https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/08/chia-network-cryptocurrenc...
previous conversation here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15655840
I've often been curious about this. I've heard this sentiment many times, but I've never heard of where/how anyone could actually buy a search history. Surely there must be some accounts of how the other side of the equation works.
Also, how much does it cost? All the facebook/google help pages I've seen focus on ads, where no personal information is shared.
My manager and I usually talk about high level strategy - he does more talking, letting me know about direction decisions that have been made or things I have to plan for.
One of my reports likes to go into a technical deep dive and get advice on whatever he happens to be working on. These usually run a bit long (a couple hours) so I have them scheduled such that it isn't a problem.
Another coworker just gives status updates, lets me know general status, points out any new issues or changes in existing challenges that I may not be aware of. I keep on top of what's going on so they're pretty short.
Another report likes to chat about the industry, what's going on, random stuff from within the company. This 1:1 is more like a little break for both of us. Sometimes we just skip if either of us is busy or there's nothing to talk about.
No two are the same, but I always try to cover two minimum things: 1) Pass down any new information that is relevant to what they're doing, and 2) Ask if there's anything they're blocked on that I can help with.
Specifically it looks like it might be a Safari problem.
Is this confusing anyone else?
Would people still have a problem if they simply relabeled it more accurately as "free facebook with a few bonus items" and marketed it as such?
If no violation has occurred and the complaint was dismissed, the "Interested Party" may sue, and if prevailing "shall be entitled to an award of actual damages, attorneys fees and costs and special damages of not less than $250 and not more than $1,000 per violation per day."
What part isn't true?
I'm a big fan of web first development and I'll be sure to use this as an example of what's possible.
In terms of tone, I wouldn't hold this up as a good example - it distracts from any legitimate argument the writer may or may not have.
Although I can't imagine this strongly affecting someone's decision, the subtler issue of result ordering (especially based on previous search history) is an interesting one.
From: http://www.broadbandforamerica.com/blog/regulatory-concessio...
"Municipalities across the U.S., nearly 1,100 of them, competed vigorously to be chosen as the site for the project, but too few had a regulatory environment conducive to the investment that was required."
I believe Salt Lake City sold their unused fiber infrastructure to Google for $1, which I'm sure helped (in return Google ).
In my opinion, the origin of these biases is in the early, formative years: When children see mom stay at home and dad go to work, they learn that that's the way things are - without any conscious negative judgement and regardless of gender. It's the society they grew up in, so seeing something deviate from that can create a bias. It's naturally self-propagating as well, so it will take conscious effort (from everyone) over generations to overcome.
I highly recommend taking the Harvard Implicit Gender - Career Bias test (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html). I found it extremely enlightening because I could actually FEEL my brain pulling me to answer incorrectly. It's timed, so there's mental pressure to make quick decisions - where the brain takes advantage of pattern matching that's been trained over a lifetime.
You can 2x the video on Youtube to see for yourself. The major drawback is cropping and computation time, which is where Microsoft's technique excels.
Since the buckets have no names, it sounds more like a description of an AI implementation than a simple binning/bucketing system.