Google's Search Algorithm Could Steal the Presidency
wired.com
wired.com
If you asked 2,000 undecided voters (BTW, if you're undecided when you go to the polls, don't vote) to read news articles in a left or right wing publication, I'd bet the voter would likely be persuaded.
This is why we see so many commercials on TV right before an election.
To me, the real issue is people not spending enough time researching a candidate.
I feel like the voters are kind of powerless in the election process. Most politicians are backed by giant corps and big money, and even the debates are rigged and the candidates are supplied with pre-selected questions, and the gerrymandering going on, sometimes it feels like we can't really affect the outcome
Case in point? The obvious manipulation of Google results for Rick Santorum (a Republican presidential candidate at one point) which continued to have x-rated results for his name when searched in Google FOR OVER 6 YEARS.
Compare that to other quick searches for Anthony Weiner or John Edwards and you hardly get one or two bad stories about them in the first ten results.
Although I can't imagine this strongly affecting someone's decision, the subtler issue of result ordering (especially based on previous search history) is an interesting one.