6,077 karma · joined April 24, 2011
It’s the standard business model in this market: sell a streaming device at or below cost and then turn to the streaming services & tell them that if they want access to the XX million people who own your device they’re going to have to pay up. 30% seems to be the going rate.
With LineageOS you get OS updates (great!) but are still vulnerable to exploits that target binary-only firmware.
If we're going to talk about cultures which have a close relationship with tea then the Turks beat out everyone else by a wide margin.
An “employer” can structure the contract to avoid IR35, but that’s precisely my point - now the “employer” needs local legal knowledge to maintain an arms length contractual relationship. (HMRC has also made the “employer” liable for IR35 problems: you can’t just punt the legal liability onto the “employee” and forget about it anymore.)
It's not hard necessarily, but you do need to get it right for each individual country. I can understand a company exec just not wanting the hassle.
You can employ through contracting agencies in the target country that handle all this stuff, but you'll still have a certain amount of pain when you run into different countries' Ideas of what is appropriate behaviour when firing someone.
There’s bound to be someone who’ll drop in a request on their behalf.
But I don’t know whether it works with the more recent RDNA2 cards.
Otherwise this is good advice.
This HN post jumped the gun a little with the Debian Wiki page: the final official release happens when https://debian.org/ gets updated to point to the new installation media.
You can’t easily drink out of an open topped container whilst wearing a headset, so without highlighting that (minor) issue, they wanted to plant the idea of having a sealed container with a straw on your desk as a solution before you ran into the problem yourself.
The second paper I reference in this comment https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=36232198 claims that humans can maintain stereopsis out to 250m.
That’s a huge difference from 10m & if true suggests that human drivers might well use 3D vision when driving.
They measured out to 18m & point out that the typical measured limits of angular resolution of the human eye mean that we could extract stereo image information out to 200m or more.
This paper claims to demonstrate stereopsis out to 250m, which is roughly the limit you’d expect from typical human visual acuity: “Stereoscopic perception of real depths at large distances” https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2191614
This paper suggests that steropsis occurs out to somewhere between 20m & 65m before other cues dominate 3D depth perception: “The Role of Binocular Cues in Human Pilot Landing Control” https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.30...
It seems that the claim that stereo vision only occurs in the near field case is probably wrong? Human stereo vision is much more capable than that & if it reaches out to significantly > 20m is surely being used when driving?
You’d also lose depth perception entirely, which can’t be good for your driving.
This is a wildly disingenuous argument! Incremental change is possible. Partial change is possible.
No. We don’t even have evidence of a candidate boson you could use to make one.
Something to think about when designing systems!
The moment a pedestrian puts their feet on the crossing they have absolute right of way & it’s on you to stop. If a pedestrian is waiting to cross, you’re expected to stop.
If Tesla exports this self driving code to the UK it’s going to cause accidents because people will absolutely not be expecting this behaviour from vehicles on the road in the UK.
Nobody believes that Twitter is worth $40billion today, not even its current owner.
Darn. Looks like I may have to create another tailscale account!
I do wonder whether this restriction will severely limit the number of 3-person free accounts that are created though - I have my own domain, but that probably puts me in a small minority of people, even the kind of nerds who are willing to try out tailscale in their own time? Which in turn might put something of a crimp on the hoped for flow of viral “my friend put me on their tailnet & I discovered how easy it was” signups.
I have been recommending tailscale to absolutely everyone though, so I guess free services work as a marketing tool!?
Modern GPS chips only need around 25mW apparently - older chips can pull 100mW though. Scanning needs a bit more power than tracking.