264 karma · joined February 8, 2016
No, they aren't. The post mentions the lack of prospects many of them have due to visa issues, as well as bias against their gender, age, or race.
Want to reduce the power of problematic employers? Encourage your unproblematic employer to hire people like these.
Don't be shy about asking what the near future of a role is.
As a minimalist related to borderline hoarders, I dread gift-giving occasions. When I give what I would want, it's considered stingy and sparse.
It's not visually unappealing, but is a rather odd addendum to a historic 19th c. town which apparently won't suffice for tourists or affluent retirees (not enough parking). It's just as managed and tidy as the developments discussed here. Speakers on light poles blare top 40 hits from the 1950s, for some reason.
[1] https://www.gocalaveras.com/location/california/gold-country...
Many women get nudged/pushed into middle management instead of promoted to technical leads or directorships. It's often a way for companies to claim they "promote" women, while forcing them into roles that are vulnerable to layoffs.
I'm still housed, and my home life is okay, which is a damn miracle, since I have been unable to rejoin the supposedly "hot" SF Bay Area tech industry. I can get interviews if I whack 15 years off my web development career on my resume. I don't pass the in-person or video interview stage, because then the employer sees that I'm older than 35.
Many of your points resonate with me intensely. We're not sick, disabled, immoral, nor incapable. We're just unemployed, given too much evidence that our societies consider us useless.
I wish you peace in this wretched time.
Not only were developers given fewer reasons to leave the office, but the non-men on staff weren't stuck with maintaining a coffee service.
I’ve noticed some anxious double-takes in interviews after passing hiring filters with my shorter resume.
And, yes, Bay Area tech hiring is needlessly hostile for men over a certain age as well.