EDIT: wow, sorry Dogecoin fans, I double-checked my notes and you’re right, it’s actually some kind of universal constant that can’t be changed
19,492 karma · joined May 1, 2011
"... and the record will show that I kicked him repeatedly long before he went down. I beat him like a mad dog with mange every time I got a chance, and I am proud of it. He was scum”
EDIT: wow, sorry Dogecoin fans, I double-checked my notes and you’re right, it’s actually some kind of universal constant that can’t be changed
By taxing people properly?
> Klein is a professor of psychiatry who studies the delightful field of “experimental panicogens”, ie chemicals that cause panic attacks if you inject them in someone. These include lactate, bicarbonate, and carbon dioxide, all of which naturally occur in the body under conditions of decreased respiration.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/04/05/the-case-of-the-suffoc...
If you’re going to go counter to a large body of scientific evidence (re efficacy of CBT), ya need something stronger than the thoughts of some people trying to hawk products, ya know?
Apparently none of the right people are sufficiently bothered, because it’s been this way for a decade and we’ve seen no real resolution to date.
1. Get them to tell you to stop as you flip through the cards vertically, and then sleight the card from the bottom of the deck instead.
2. A simple counting trick like this https://youtu.be/ekPbMhJGYmc
People are saying you shouldn’t put a number in there because if it’s not already in there, you are leaking some kind of privileged information.
That’s not true.
I think your point about confusion with constituent states is spot on though
This is a weird metric.
What is the point?
Nation state is not a fancy infosec way of saying country
I assume you're talking -- primarily -- about the Senate and the filibuster? If so, you'll be pleased to hear the UK has managed OK for the last 400-500 years in having a parliament that can do _literally anything_ it wants with a majority of 1 person[0] including deciding to pick on a single person individually without trial and subject them to whatever it pleases[1].
> Thanks to Linus Torvalds, we not only have a consensus on architecture, but we've come pretty close to having a consensus on the input output mechanism by which programs communicate with their host machines, via the SYSCALL instruction. He accomplished that by sitting at home in a bathrobe sending emails to huge corporations, getting them to agree to devote their resources to creating something beautifully opposite to tragedy of the commons.
Could someone explain this to me?
> “Ü” is a single grapheme cluster, even though it’s composed of two codepoints: U+0055 UPPER-CASE U followed by U+0308 COMBINING DIAERESIS.
would be a great opportunity to talk about normal form, because there’s also a single code point version: “latin capital letter u with diaeresis”.
... is probably a better link than the random discussion in that horrible JS webapp?