19,492 karma · joined May 1, 2011
"... and the record will show that I kicked him repeatedly long before he went down. I beat him like a mad dog with mange every time I got a chance, and I am proud of it. He was scum”
Added bonus: both will confirm the recipient name, and if I truly, actually fuck up the payment, I can get the money back again rather than it disappearing into the ether.
Finally: the money I have transferred is now available to actually spend on things straight away, without needing to then reconvert it to real people money with a sizeable cost.
Like inheriting it, which is the shadiest of shady ways to make money
Why?
For the vast majority of people, if they do have the keys, their personal security is poor enough that someone will get a copy.
I'm sure there's a number for which I'd agree to be stranded on a boat off the coast of Egypt without power, but I suspect it's closer to 15x my salary.
As I understand it, this makes the latter 100x worse than the former.
That’s not what that means.
> Face masks ... don’t work to slow transmission whatsoever
and when pushed on it, you imply that this is true because there’s been no trial on it, which is not how implication works.
You then also try and suggest the presence of an unfalsifiable hypothesis which you don’t try and explain, and seems suggestive that you don’t know what the term means?
> Google [says] "The Daily Mail's claims are completely inaccurate. The use of our ad tech tools has no bearing on how a publisher's website ranks in Google search."
Not a fan of either party, but I hope we get to find out who's accurate.
This isn’t true in my experience. If you’re trying to make a decision based on comp+bonus then ask what the bonus ended up being the last few years