pch00

So at least there's a potential bright side for people in the UK :-)

This is it precisely. When you're paying Redhat for an "enterprise" Linux then that guarantee should extend down their entire software stack. Just getting the odd backported patch and so-so email support no longer cuts it.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/uk-gov-keeps-...

The industry has this narrative because it suits their desire to sell higher-margined cloud services. However in the real world, especially in academia as cks is, the reality is that many workloads are still not suitable for the cloud.

OneNote with it's "paste anything, anywhere on the page" and fairly minimal organisational options make it the closest thing to a notebook/scrapbook I've ever used on a computer. It's not perfect, and I've come to accept that :-)

My favourite ever iphone was the plastic-bodied 5C, never felt the need for a case on that thing and it felt indestructible.

Second: webmin also has a patchy security history. I don't know enough about cockpit to say it's any better but it would certainly be enough of an issue to review all of the options.

https://9to5mac.com/2023/09/23/iphone-15-pro-max-back-glass-...

I wonder, what happens to OceanGate as a company now? They've lost the CEO who I suppose bore the ultimate responsibility but are other executives on the hook here? Would a full investigation look at design decisions, etc.

Just checked, and yes, no phone or email recovery methods configured.

Google on the other hand, do this correctly. You can configure a consumer Google account to only have secure options listed.

The fact that "it still works" isn't the only consideration though - it's the security posture. There's plenty of remotely-exploitable flaws in that software stack from 2013.

Solaris containers didn't have anything like Docker Hub nor was setting them up as easy as "docker run".

(Posting as ex-Solaris guy)

This has always been my view. Google died in 2007, the thing that's still calling itself Google since then is Doubleclick.

Perhaps it's too late for many stores but I'd love it if we were actually on some kind of partial "rebalancing" of retail.

But in the case of the mobile apps, downloaded from their respective platform's app store, how can you guarantee the code you see on github is the exact same code you're running on your device?

Admittedly this supply-chain-verification is an issue for all mobile app store apps but seems particularly important with something like a password manager.

I've had the same issue with cigarette smoke since I quit ~20 years ago. The smell is awful and I seem to be hyper-sensitive to it if someone is smoking even remotely nearby.

Yes, in hindsight it came off more clickbaity than intended. The article did raise a theme of frustration I share though: sometimes you just want the framework/tooling to get out of the way and let you write, something that regularly comes up when I'm working through technical documentation.

Not affiliated at all, just a happy user.

Since my Nest Hub received the update to Fuchsia it's been generally more laggy and unresponsive. Occasionally it needs a power cycle. I wish there was a way to downgrade to whatever it had pre-Fuchsia :(