243 karma · joined December 23, 2012
Programmer here. It's true. I deal with NP completeness every day.
I don't understand why some are wary of government regulations, but have no qualms about being controlled by major corporations where you don't even have a vote.
Social media sites are legally entitled to censure things they disagree with, but it's dishonest how they portray themselves as being non-partizan.
The entitlement of ad tech is unbelievable.
> I'd liken it to reading a post on mumsnet.com with 100+ middle aged women arguing
Yeah, women, amirite?
If you steal an candy bar, the government can "compel speech" in the form of forcing you to return the stolen property.
I'm not a native English speaker, but I find it funny how Americans often consider English spellings wrong.
I wonder if American Hispanics do the same for Spaniards:
> Ahem, it's pronounced "ustedes", not "vosotros". That's not a word.
For example, even in the US, courts have established that Twitter is a public forum with respect to what politicians (such as Trump) say. But do other people get such protections?
In my country, Romania, the supreme court declared that Facebook is a public space, so if you say something like "the police can blow me" you'll get a letter from the police telling you so show up at the station so that they can fine you (swearing is illegal in Romania).
But Facebook can take down something I can say in public, meaning I'm not allowed free speech. It's not fair that I suffer all the consequences of a "public space", but none of the rights.
Not really. If they're downloaded, why would you need to look up remotely what you have locally.
But in the end I guess what matters more is whether you want a single person to control what you view or not, like when they banned James Joyce because of an illustration of a man skinny dipping.
Yeah, they're the ones bitching and moaning all of the loot out of the stores.
For example consider just "vo" vs "io". The end of "v" ends horizontally near the top. "i" end at the bottom. So the line that starts "o" has to begin at different positions.
Most fonts solve this by starting a discontinuous "o" always at the bottom. But this looks ugly.
And that's jut two letter combinations...
> They can do what they want with their platform.
Of course they can, but they can't then say they believe in free speech. Similarly to "you don't make peace with your friends" : you can't say you're free speech if you only allow information you agree with.
What annoys me is when people think that free speech isn't a principle, but just a law in the US which applies to the government only. It's usually: "Hurr duur, it's a private company so it can practice full communism and we should be okay with that."
(That said, personally I have mixed feelings about this because I feel like it might be causing harm... Same with the antivaxxer crap.)
It's disgraceful that WHO refused information requests from Taiwan and to see senior officials feigning deafness when questioned about Taiwan.
"Greater good"? You sound like an ambassador for Red Star OS[1]. :)
The argument I've heard people make multiple times is that "if you have mud on your shoes, do you wash them with water or with paper", but that's the wrong analogy. If I had (human) shit on my shoes, I wouldn't do either, I'd throw them away.
Really? I thought HK was notorious for it's housing crysis where you have people living in flats the size of closets. According to this[1] only 24 % of land is developed in HK (7 % is residential). My understanding is that the government does this on purpose because it makes the majority of its budget from this.
[1]: https://www.cedd.gov.hk/filemanager/eng/content_954/Info_She...