Hacker News Reader

You're not even trying to hide that policies don't matter. Apparently it's all about whether you agree with the author or not.

Social media sites are legally entitled to censure things they disagree with, but it's dishonest how they portray themselves as being non-partizan.

> Social media sites are legally entitled to censure things they disagree with

That's right. But when they do that, can they claim that they are a 'platform' and not a 'publisher' ?

If paulX is a for-profit-business can he claim that his business a non profit and apply tax code designed for non-profit charities ?