190 karma · joined April 29, 2009
In fact, they're so dissatisfied, that they're willing to put their money where their mouth is, which is a very strong signal to send to Facebook.
Even if diaspora goes nowhere, it might still have a positive impact on Facebook.
Thanks.
Once in an effort to reach maximum typing efficiency, i attempted a switch to VIM+Dvorak. However, i quickly realized that i would have to use a Danish variant of Dvorak (there is no official standard..) and remap VIM to oblivion, which would make me too much of an oddball masochist.
I've remapped caps lock to ESC, which I think is a far better use of that useless button, and a hack i recommend to everybody i know who uses VIM.
I could never understand that VIM choose to put such an important button so far away from the homerow.
I think it's a good idea, and i'd subscribe if my country was supported.
Stuff like: how the device feels to sit with for longer periods of time, is it more natural to type with one finger or both thumbs when sitting, can i read while lying down... All the stuff that isn't just "it has this amount of ram, you can view videos and the web on it and...."
The point being that it's probably not so much about him not liking that you mentioned him[2], as the fact that you're stepping onto his turf, and him wanting to defend it.
[1] = http://www.mediabistro.com/prnewser/news/adweek_haro_is_800k...
[2] = You write: "I’m pretty disappointed that Peter decided to be such a jackass about this. If he had bothered to write me an email, I would have gladly removed his name and never mentioned this to anyone."
It's (like so much else) like comparing an apple to an orange.
However, i also fondly remember a time not long ago where all i had to do was to develop in IE6 and I'd be sure it would work for most everybody ;-)
one features a drumset: http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/interactive/ac0b/
and the other has a guitar you can strum: http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/interactive/c498/
The negative part about them is that the gear is not extrudes a little bit from the shirt itself.
I looked for exactly this half a year ago, and couldn't find anything. I ended up writing my own template language, which i never would have done if there was a good option out there already. I'll probably open source my template language also, just in case anybody finds it usefull.
It's actually one of the bad things about .net: the open source community is much smaller than for other languages. Usually when you need something (like a nice template language), you have some commercial options and very few open source projects -- if any -- that hopefully are still maintained and up to date.
No affiliation, just like it.
I ended up not using it because most fonts (i tried a lot) looks really bad anti-aliasing turned off; especially at the small (body-text) font sizes.
If only there was a way to tell the browser to only use the fonts if anti-aliasing was turned on
I called it "Arnold" because it was strong and squeezed javascript into a smaller shape.
For the on boarding experience, i think it's really worth putting emphasis on the fact that the free Express versions are really fully functional products for daily use.
For instance, I always sign up with [servicename].account@mydomain.com and only ever give out my personal e-mail to people i meet in person.
The great thing is that if a [servicename].account address starts getting spam, i know which service sold my address and i can just blackhole that address.
That way, i never have to obfuscate my address, since i'll always just create a new one for the specific need. It's probably not for everyone though...
This will hide the current app and all its windows, and it's already enabled by default on os x.
Nobody that ends up at that website, accidentally or not, will be confused about what that company does.
My guess would be that the reason they're acting like they are, is that they have to strictly enforce the rules as they are written.
If they make exceptions or even approve an app that doesn't conform 100%; could that not later be used as a prior art opening up all sorts of discussions/legal-nastyness?
If they rephrased the rules such that they could use their own best judgement on a case-by-case basis, the discussions would just be bigger when one app gets approved and another one doesn't.
At least this way, it should be fairly clear as an app developer whether your app will get approved or not: If they can find anything "bad" in it, it won't.