ofslidingfeet

Yeah well, OpenAI compressed the whole internet into proprietary weights and is now providing access via paid subscription while the original internet gets deleted from our culture.

Par for the course in the prissiest, most Karen city culture in the entire country. Seriously, living in King County is like living in a giant HOA neighborhood.

How many closed session hearings did the U.S. congress have over windshield pitting again?

Alternative title: "Obviously Irresponsible, Intellectually Lazy Things that We Definitely Haven't Been Doing for Fifteen Years."

I think this contextualizes how hard they tried to make their site unusable on web browsers. "Front page of the internet." Thanks glowies.

I am so embarrassed of my fascist government that it is becoming intolerable.

It gives manager types a way to pretend talking is working while inverting accountability which is prerequisite for any process they're willing to adopt.

Basically a blogpost tbh, and it begs the question by defining language as verbal communication.

In other news: OpenAI volunteers to integrate itself into all of Apple's products for free.

Maybe the powers that be will have to come to terms with how they have *completely fucking obliterated all public trust in any large institution*.

We're supposed to have free speech in the west. Shut the fuck up about Russia, the gestapo.

But don't forget that these are prestigious institutions and we should trust what their "experts" say without question or be shadowbanned from social media.

Soon to be a question asked about the entire internet pre-2019.

You forgot to quote the part where I said the FBI won't stop blatantly interfering with elections.

t. Jerome Powell and Julie Su

I have to say, I'm just struck with astonishment to encounter a truism about "flexible government" as a defense of autocratic despotism.

Laws are tautologically in the domain of government.

edit: If the torture is unlawful, then the government is illegitimate. I'm not saying life doesn't suck; I'm just saying no actually citizens should not tolerate unjust laws just because making just laws is ~too hard~.

(I had to add this reply in an edit because this garbage ass gestapo run website is throttling my reply rate.)

Wow who ever knew that all we ever had to do was hand philosophy off to programmers, and they would have definitive answers to centuries old questions that we weren't even sure are answerable.

I'm sure their attempt to ban music with a given nominal feature will be a total success with no complications then.

If the government can't make coherent laws, that is the government's problem.

If a formal system isn't consistent, then it shouldn't work.

That doesn't sound like they have a big lawsuit/investigation on the radar or anything.

Once upon a time, this would have been the only thing the internet talked about today. Top of reddit, thousands of comments on news articles, etc.

Now we get suppression and astroturfing from a bunch of autocrats who despise democracy and call themselves the "Intelligence Community."

I've never cared about anything less than I care about the price of stadium concert tickets.

Literally just fascist secret police, in real life.

Cool, now do security clearances, i.e. the real citizenship now.

All this heady analysis because a company changed its name without permission from gestapo.

You make them sound important or rare or something.

They have jobs where the interview isn't a hazing ritual. Those do exist, if you don't need a tech salary.

We'll eventually get to the point where anyone willing to jump through these stupid hoops is primarily motivated by greed.

I don't really buy that they accidentally used a model capable of generating nude breasts. This is either bored glowies trying to decide for everyone whether AI is acceptable or the woman is lying.