403 karma · joined February 28, 2012
My email is my username @ reenhanced.com. I am happy to receive email from you at any time.
It is probably not too late for a state-driven type of service layer like this from some rationally led government somewhere in the world.
Many people are far too picky and have expectations out of line with the rest of the world when it comes to software. Ignore those. There are plenty out there who will happily part with $3 for some entertainment to share with their pet.
You will never please everyone.
There is a tool available for chromecast that works very well, but my ideal solution would be an app I can load onto the shield that auto-mutes during ads and un-mutes when the ads are finished.
If I didn't already have my hands full with side projects, I'd dig into this on my own time.
Enshittification comes for everything, eventually.
If not, how hard would it be to interact with the hdmi stream and implement an auto-mute feature? I've been considering ways to remove these annoyances and since they don't provide a convenient way for smart people they're justifying the effort to a more complicated approach.
These companies need to leave some low-hanging fruit or they're going to be incentivizing a whole host of developers who are more motivated to solve this problem than anyone they could possibly hire internally.
I have absolutely no way to prove this gut feeling.
There is absolutely some truth to this.
As an insurance company, you are incentivized to de-risk your pool as much as possible, and by spending a few dollars you're able to get to the earliest possible signals of who might be needing services very easily. Things like complaining about a sore throat on social media to friends, or even within private messages, are all things you might be interested in. Other signals, purchase history, location history, contact tracing, all of these provide potential ways to spot early risk and increase rates/push out the undesirable members of the pool.
Of all of the potential customers of our data, I keep coming back to insurance companies as having the most interest in these signals. When you can identify risks correctly, you can trim out or adjust rates to make things as safe as possible for your income stream.
This has a reactionary component to it that hurts us all. With most of our communication being digital now, I find myself thinking twice about putting out anything that could be taken as a signal to an insurance company. As an avid runner with most of our events organized online, this presents a social cost because I just won't engage in some conversations for fear of how companies will use whatever I might engage with against me.
Where does this type of behavior lead when practiced at scale?
I have discovered other ideas like this but the lack of leverage makes it really hard to justify the squeeze
It astounds me that there aren't more people interested in cutting off the constant telemetry and to be honest it wouldn't surprise me if the car refuses to operate correctly when I do figure out where it's at and pull it.
This feature allows you to define an api and run it from a Microsoft server somewhere to validate it works.
What security assumptions are applied to the environment from where these run? Are those assumptions universal?
A bit too nervous to pull the trigger just yet
I'm pulling the trigger on this after 17 years in business and our ARR covered 50% of our anticipated annual expenses last year.
We also grew by 100% last year, all while on coast with $0 spent in marketing.
The time we spend on the products, when added up over time, the most valuable time we spend, so we have cut expenses and plowed away revenue to help us make this launch this year.
The goal is to meet 100% of anticipated annual expenses in net ARR by the end of this year and it feels very doable.
After 17 years, I'm also shy to discuss details because it's taken dozens, if not hundreds of attempts to find something that worked. Started in 2005.