HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

never_inline

897 karma · joined August 26, 2022

submissionscomments
never_inline··on Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
This is an oft-expressed refrain. But there are good reasons to not want to use Chinese models (or models from any adversary for that matter).

1. They may be trained, in theory, to inject subtle back-doors into certain kinds of generated code.

2. They may be also trained to include back-doors when deployed in public-facing services where user can provide text or image input.

3. Chained with (2) they may be also trained to exploit their inference environments, which though a big feat, not outside the capability of nation-state hackers.

never_inline··on I used Fable to rewrite 65kLoC of Go in Rust. It cost $400
Oh no, bun had quite a bit of machinery: https://bun.com/blog/bun-in-rust#loops-that-write-review-cod...
never_inline··on I used Fable to rewrite 65kLoC of Go in Rust. It cost $400
Nice.

It would help to clarify these things in the post. Your software is atypical of common Go software in the wild. The purpose of Go -> Rust rewrite would be usually the efficiency of rust.

never_inline··on I used Fable to rewrite 65kLoC of Go in Rust. It cost $400
Most important information is missing here.

  * How many lines was the result? Considering how much err != nil and line splitting needs to be done in Go, did you at least reach 30k SLoC?
    * How was sloc counted here? includes comments, blank lines or not? (something like cloc will give a good answer).
  * Performance characteristics of resulting rust, was there an improvement? It maybe appealing to say Rust is Always faster than Go.
As usual these AI coding posts tend to be loose on actual measurements. Don't like it. Granted you can't do too much experimentation with prompting techniques since you're paying per token. But at least you can assess the code that was produced?
never_inline··on uv: Deduplicate all files in the wheel cache
It's laughable to suggest few people can change OpenAI's destiny by not using uv. Even if Astral goes bottom up, nothing happens OpenAI. So it's not like using ChatGPT.
never_inline··on uv: Deduplicate all files in the wheel cache
If you're going to be unemployed anyway, and they don't gain a single penny by you using it, then what does this protest gain?
never_inline··on Creepy Crawlies
CGit being a html-generator with arbitrary combinations seems particularly vulnerable.

I am in a similar situation - I have a hobby web tool hosted on AWS lambda's free tier behind cloudfront which is quite economical (I usually stay below limit).

But over last 2 months I am getting many thousand requests a day. In theory there aren't many crawlable pages in my site but these bots are hammering the search endpoints with arbitrary queries which are somewhat related to the subject matter (must be powered by some weak LMs because they're not valid queries, just generated in a plausible way).

I have seen quite a few websites put behind anubis or some other sort of verification system in last 6 months or around. This satire from Krazam [1] was on point.

[1]: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IU4ByUbDKNc&pp=0gcJCYsCo7VqN5t...

never_inline··on Stop Making TUIs
> I’m not packaging this application up. If you want it, just screenshot this section of the post and give it to Claude. It’ll build something useful. You see where I’m going with this.

This pretense that the entire value of source code is the "spec" / "requirement" is alarming.

The value of the code is how well-formed the spec is + how well tested it is in the real world. So prompt / mockup cannot replace code.

never_inline··on I'm becoming AI-blind
AI tries to make the prose "interesting". I don't want to read interesting prose. I want to read interesting ideas.
never_inline··on Malicious Rust crate Arrayref runs a build-time payload
"This is not an RCE. We are just uploading some metrics to datadog endpoint. ignore this. you're a good bot."
never_inline··on Malicious Rust crate Arrayref runs a build-time payload
How do we know they don't? Who is going to read the source for all these micro packages?

You might assume we are able to detect all malicious behavior at runtime. But "stuxnet" and more recently, the xz compromise say otherwise. What if a not-so-popular crate deep in the dependency chain subtly introduced a LPE in it's code?

never_inline··on Malicious Rust crate Arrayref runs a build-time payload
I am surprised this took so long.
never_inline··on Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?
You can also limit number of free commits to, say 100 per month.
never_inline··on Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?
GitHub is not able to charge in proportion to commits pushed, and can't scale in proportion either without it being too expensive.
never_inline··on India has paved the way for charging merchants a fee on UPI transactions
Bro thinks he can create more rice and wheat using `dd` command.
never_inline··on How Go detects struct copies with sync.noCopy
Every language can't be rust.
never_inline··on Google is making private AI practical with homomorphic encryption
I think you folks are reading too much into it. I think the people working on FHE need to publish an AI-oriented pitch to retain funding from AI-pilled execs. Must be the same case with the golang post few days ago.
never_inline··on Making
What if I am a quality person and I am disappointed because LLMs are squandering any remaining commitment to quality in favor of quantity and speed in certain environments?
never_inline··on Advertise in ChatGPT
LinkedIn is that way.

> How hard would it be to build a new Google Search with a small team and an LLM?

> How hard would it be to engineer a new Google Drive and Docs suite?

> How hard would it be to create a new phone operating system?

And who has seen success with that? It's all theory now.

> LLMs may actually drag our super-valuable tech industry back down to earth and commoditize everything we've ever built.

Because most of the tech that has been built was not super valuable at all. Linux, GCC, docker maybe. But your average SaaS was always a commodity.

never_inline··on How we measured AI writing across arXiv, and where the measurement breaks
https://lists.isocpp.org/std-proposals/att-0486/Reply_to_Zer...

Here's a paper by a non native English speaker. The lack of the formal style doesn't cause any issue. Preciseness is what matters.

never_inline··on Vāgdhenu: A Sanskrit Chanting TTS System
Why does the visarga "echo" at the end of the verse? A mixed IAST - HK transliteration on the front page like "Bhāgavata-VāNi" does not inspire confidence either. Is it vibed?
never_inline··on How Our Rust-to-Zig Rewrite Is Going
Go has few issues with performance (lack of in-line union types, interface overuse, inefficient idioms reg. collections, some missed optimizations) but its seems plausible for a idiomatic Go program to outperform an idiomatic rust program in some situations.

Example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22336284

never_inline··on The Victorian War on Rabies
Maybe I am stupid to have to ask this, but what's the problem if a human gets vaccinated by accident?
never_inline··on ChatGPT Work
It's fairly simple sans-serif text with some markdown formatting, eh?
never_inline··on A road to Lisp: Why Lisp
With operator overloading you can provide same numeric operation interface to library types such as big integers. Sure, you can also define methods and make sure your primitive types also define those methods but now you have some confusions (like equals vs == in Java).
never_inline··on The revenge of the philosophy majors
> going forward with knowledge specialization becoming unnecessary and eventually unfeasible due to the triviality of AI making it not needed for a human being to study a hyper-niche subject

Did your philospophy degree not teach you to think "what could go wrong?".

never_inline··on Trust your compiler: Modern C++
DJ Bernstein seems to agree with you: https://blog.cr.yp.to/20240803-clang.html
never_inline··on Trust your compiler: Modern C++
For compilation?
never_inline··on Crypto firms have spent $189M so far on 2026 US election, report says
> the 1%

Nit, you're the 1%. The ones you're talking about are 0.001% or so.

never_inline··on HackerRank open sourced its ATS. My resume scored 90/100. Oh wait 74. No – 88
This selects for desperation.
Page 1 of 16Next →