I'd prefer a weighted shuffle based on the staleness of a song in a playlist. That way you eventually get through all of the music but in a pseudo-random order.
70 karma · joined May 1, 2018
I'd prefer a weighted shuffle based on the staleness of a song in a playlist. That way you eventually get through all of the music but in a pseudo-random order.
I'll paraphrase a comment I saw on HN recently:
"The old advice 'save often in case of loss' has now become 'save often to prepare for when Google shuts you off'."
Use big cloud technology to learn and further your projects BUT DO NOT RELY ON IT (unless you like to gamble).
(It took a few minutes to get this link to work for me)
For my part, one of the biggest wins has been freely available and HIGH quality development tools and languages. I still have PTSD from C++ compilers licensing. I'm still hoping that Office tools will get there.
And as for the possibility of "less software developers" ... unlikely! Again, there will be (and are) fewer low-level power-programmers but many many more high-level business coders. You don't want your guru working on that stubborn input field validation but you DO need SOMEONE to do it
For longer prose and procedures (particularly troubleshooting a very specific problem) I am encouraging blog posts with tags that link back to the parent page. These degrade more obviously due to their chronological nature and feel less jarring to prune (which can be done simply by changing the tags).
I remember a long long time ago when the company I worked for did a big move and went from offices to cubes. I was young and naive and willing to try the experiment but within a month or two I regretted the change and things haven't gone back since.
I'd prefer sharing an office rather than an entire floor.
Then again perhaps in web apps there's something to be said for this when breaking changes ARE the consistency. I have to say that working in back-end technology, I don't really care whether something was built in 2010 or 2020 as long as it's doing its job well.
Unfortunately, most back-end technology still communicates with web API's at some point and then we're at the mercy of the service's "version".
This happens at smaller companies in smaller ways but the effect is the same.
It's worse than the "Mythical Man Month" in that production is not simply slowed down but it is slowly made rotten until it gets burned, buried, or passed off to out-sourced maintenance.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/12/google-cloud-ceo-thomas-kuri...
In the meantime, I'm quite happy to see Microsoft participating feverishly. I much prefer that to the alternative of intentionally making my life hell when not using their software / systems.
I'd prefer "The platform says it will never sell user data and relies on paying customers rather than ads"
I point this out because unless you get everyone using your IPv6 address directly, your name is certainly NOT decentralized.
I have a lot of Python 2.7 code that I wrote years ago which has been running smoothly and my team is generally going to rewrite rather than "convert" because I really don't trust conversions. I'd rather see all bugs upfront rather than hidden in the fog.
I tried the rewards/BAT thing for a while but after a few computer changes and losing my wallet through the process, I gave up and just block everything and contribute nothing. I'd like to get back into it but all of those transitions just killed it for me.
All that said, there's a lot of good stuff in here and I'm happy to be using it as my primary browser. Now that they're hitting 1.0 I may actually be able to recommend it to non-tech people.
Anyway, this is what I thought of about halfway through the article when it veered off into contemporary politics.