I decided to uninstall Messenger, I like being able to chat while browsing other Facebook pages.
1,047 karma · joined February 6, 2011
I decided to uninstall Messenger, I like being able to chat while browsing other Facebook pages.
[1] https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/svpply/id516820047?mt=8
See also: Layervault, Artsy, Letterpress.
http://www.3sixteen.com/collections/homepage/products/st100x...
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/time-out-new-york-for-ipad/i...
So what's the deal with the horrible magazine one?
For shame!
The other issue, which is one of the reasons I stopped playing (aside from me pretty much stopping playing video games in general) is aesthetic overload. I don't like the notion of things being called "purely cosmetic" because appearances have meanings. The 9 classes were designed to be recognizable from their silhouettes alone, which is pretty brilliant. But now you can pile an absurd number of things onto your character, completely changing that. Not only do you not know what your opponent is equipped with anymore, you also have an additional psychological blocker to identifying them. And it's just tacky. TF2 was originally a 60s spy movie parody, and I really felt that. Now it's just... everything. It's just a lot less compelling to me.
So it seems like there are two choices:
1. There's a wrapper library on top of UIKit instead of straight bindings. Not good, more levels of junk, and can't really provide access to the entirety of the API since it doesn't 100% match with Android.
2. It's platform portable... as long as you don't actually use any system frameworks. In that case, it could be nice for games, I guess, but would it be fast enough?
I figure that what it does it use the actual rendered pixel grid for subpixel calculations.
If you want to make a higher order function library, that's fine, but I don't see what it has to do with mapping data to JSON, and I don't think that users of the library should have to get a bunch of modifications to the standard container classes to get the nice model class. Why not split it into two libraries?
However, everything that Panic makes is incredible in both quality and Mac-ness. I use Transmit and love it, didn't think of it when making that list since it's not something you have open all of the time.
Then, look at Panic's iOS apps. They feel like iOS apps. Diet Coda and Coda are companion products, but they aren't identical. They each look and feel how an application on their respective platforms should feel (which is fairly open ended on iOS, but restrictive on OS X due to the shared desktop canvas).
Few other apps I use or have used in the past, non-Apple, fit in pretty well:
* Adium
* Colloquy
* Chrome
* NetNewsWire
* Reeder
* Sparrow
I really, really like Twitter for Mac, even if it's abandoned now. I'm not sure if Tapbots has fixed it (and I'm not going to spend $20 on a client I don't like the visuals of to find out), but Twitter for Mac absolutely beat Tweetbot Alpha in scrolling (using TwUI helps quite a bit most likely). So I'll keep using that for now on my external monitor where it doesn't look blurry.
[1]:
* Safari
* iTerm2
* Xcode
* Messages
* MacVim
* iTunes
I also don't like how the trains just instantly turn around and how T intersections on rails are possible - these are things that were okay in the 90s, but that I would have hoped to be fixed by now.
if (NSClassFromString(@"UICollectionView")) // or something that makes a lot more sense, but that came to mind immediately
{
// facebook stuff
}
// Twitter.framework stuff* Walk to W4th, A train (or C/E train) directly to Port Authority
* BDFM from Bway/Lafayette to W4th, A train
* BDFM from Bway/Lafayette to NQR at 34th, walk from 42nd.
* NR from Prince to 42nd
* 6 from Bleecker/Spring to Union Square, NQR to 42nd. This is a long and annoying transfer, which Google probably picked up on.
* 6/NR -> L -> ACE (probably not)
Since Embark's map is the stylized subway map, it doesn't really help with geographic locations.
There are other situations like this: should I take the J train at Bowery directly over the bridge and walk for a while on the other side, or should I walk to the 6 and take the L train under the river, getting off much closer to my destination? The estimated walking time factors into this - if there's a J train about to arrive and I'll narrowly miss the 6, the answer is obvious. If I'm going to have to wait for both, my time is better spent walking to a train that will get me closer to my destination.
I can't believe this is something they're actually going to release. I hope that it might be better on release, but it seems like the backend should be continually upgraded.