2,540 karma · joined August 26, 2015
The AMA lobbies for more _subsidized_ residencies while downplaying that unsubsidized residencies also exist and could expand without waiting on more taxpayer funding
https://github.com/PatMyron/cloud#compute--memory-unit-price...
https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/...
https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/feder...
Despite h-index claiming to balance quantity and quality, it obviously incentives quantity over quality (no single publication can increment h-index as much as churning out a few worthless publications that cite each other); med students overwhelmingly follow those incentives trying to secure better residencies
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-BDS_laws#Anti-BDS_laws_in_th...
> (2) ETF management
(1) seems like their (stated) differentiator itself; plenty of organizations already offer ETFs that omit selected companies
I doubt their data is cleaner internally than it is on their website. They're bringing in millions annually from their expense ratios:
https://www.inspireetf.com/etfs
and overpromising/underdelivering on their ability to diligently deliver (1)
Secondary listings allow entire companies to trade on multiple exchanges (not just corresponding subsidiaries)
So I agree that it was likely just a mistake to list multiple listings of the same companies, but the fact that they usually receive different scores proves their process isn't diligent:
* $GOOGL.MX is dinged for multiple non-Mexico-specific violations that the other listing isn't
$GOOGL.MX scoring differently than other $GOOGL listings makes me extremely skeptical that humans are diligently creating these scores (finance professionals should've recognized that secondary listings like $GOOGL.MX don't need their own scoring)
Regardless, most companies I checked have multiple different ratings because that site can't even do basic data cleaning:
https://inspireinsight.com/AAPL/US https://inspireinsight.com/AAPL/PT
https://inspireinsight.com/GOOGL/GT https://inspireinsight.com/GOOGL/MX
https://inspireinsight.com/MSFT/AU https://inspireinsight.com/MSFT/US
https://inspireinsight.com/AVGO/US https://inspireinsight.com/0YXG/GB
https://inspireinsight.com/TSM/US https://inspireinsight.com/5425/TW
https://inspireinsight.com/LUBEREF/SA https://inspireinsight.com/2223/SA
so even they disagree with their own ratings ;)
* air quality
* environmental risk
* GHG emissions
* ecological impact
* product sustainability
https://www.inspireetf.com/screening
yet weights ExxonMobil, the 21st largest company:
https://companiesmarketcap.com/
as by far their 2nd largest holding:
and nutrition, pollution, infectious diseases, etc
[Nitpick] There are a few more AWS partitions like GovCloud:
Even ignoring the adverse selection of who'd subscribe, their ARPU is higher than that in North America: https://www.statista.com/statistics/251328/facebooks-average...
'In 2024, median farm operator household income exceeded median U.S. household income by 22.7 percent'
'In 2024, the median U.S. farm household had $1.6 million in wealth'
'In 2024, fewer than 3 percent of all farm households had wealth levels that were lower than the estimated U.S. median household level and over 97 percent had wealth levels higher than the U.S. median'
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-household-...
Even for marketing puffery, "only" seems reductive when most resource usage seems specific to a few animal products like cows and lamb: https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets