Secondary listings allow entire companies to trade on multiple exchanges (not just corresponding subsidiaries)
So I agree that it was likely just a mistake to list multiple listings of the same companies, but the fact that they usually receive different scores proves their process isn't diligent:
* $GOOGL.MX is dinged for multiple non-Mexico-specific violations that the other listing isn't
- (1) Insight scores
- (2) ETF management
I think the pipeline between (1) and (2) is probably tight within the company (probably a few big Excel spreadsheets) and the (2) side has a lot of brains.
But the (1) side needs to do more work on the pipeline between those spreadsheets and the Web, and maybe hire more/better software dev help for that. They'd do better to use Postgres as their source of truth.
> (2) ETF management
(1) seems like their (stated) differentiator itself; plenty of organizations already offer ETFs that omit selected companies
I doubt their data is cleaner internally than it is on their website. They're bringing in millions annually from their expense ratios:
https://www.inspireetf.com/etfs
and overpromising/underdelivering on their ability to diligently deliver (1)