459 karma · joined November 27, 2011
To serve from our own server there would be a delay - Apple also has a serve that lets you deliver assets from their server, still a delay, but much faster infrastructure than we could afford.
Regarding the "Parents can't resist" - I ment that in regards to School Apparel as that was their description. 97% of the parents that download our app can resist ;)
We never released 10 books w/ out the Buy All option so you're assumption is correct - we have no data on this. You could be correct in that it was solely content as a gating factor, had we tested incrementally we would have firmer data in this area.
The $2.99 version netted us less than $20 in the lifetime of the application. It never was ranked anywhere in the app store and thus was virtually DOA.
I agree it would be great to charge upfront - We didn't have a budget to market these applications to them to show them the value before they reach the store which would be essential in that business model. The freemium model was our only way to leverage the rankings in the store and give parents the ability to see the value in the application before buying.
I think growth and the lack of defined future benefit also played a huge part here. Both are critical to job satisfaction.
http://gizmodo.com/5164841/robot-programmed-to-love-traps-wo...
Here's an article on the actual robot:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2006/05/21/news/robots-will...
San Diego, CA
Backend Node.js Developer (or proficient in Javascript - we can train)
Tiny Factory (tinyfactory.co) is looking for a Node.js developer to work on some large scale client and internal projects. Open to full time / part time in house (Downtown San Diego). email hello@tinyfactory.co if interested.
Looks like there's just a couple images linked from our img sub domain - everything else was copied and pasted.
Thanks for the tip ;) I'm looking into it now