By "welfare", I guess you meant the sponsoring of useless administrative job meant to ensure easy mechanical turk work to appease the masses.
The money actually going for care is pretty minimal.
195 karma · joined February 11, 2015
By "welfare", I guess you meant the sponsoring of useless administrative job meant to ensure easy mechanical turk work to appease the masses.
The money actually going for care is pretty minimal.
Do you mean totalitarian, correct ?
Still are.
Google & co are very clearly monetizing (either directly or indirectly) their integration, WMF might as well get something out of it.
Though, this discussion might be going the "BSD vs GPL" direction...
That's even more of a problem if you do not support such scheme to extort money from the working classes.
Because all that infra you rely on builds itself magically !
Did you read (and understand) the original comment ? It read:
> Cycling through other currencies* would then be treated like any other form of money laundering
Soros cycled through currencies while at war with the BoE, applying OP comment, it would then have to be treated as money laundering if applied to fiat currencies.
How about porn ? ;-)
What is your argument for it not being such a giant waste ?
Remember, we are now living in a guilty-until-proven-innocent world.
It could be argued that straight resistive heating is inefficient compared to using a heat pump, so on, it might not be that legitimate
> for entertainment
You don't need to use electricity to entertain yourself. Worth, why would you entertain yourself when you can think relentlessly about the betterment of Peoplekind.
> a better solution would be to target the exchanges
Crypto don't need exchanges to survive.
> Cycling through other currencies would then be treated like any other form of money laundering
Then Wall-Street traders would be the first to go to jail. Soros made his fortune betting against the british pound.
Given that at least 3/4 of the US has eating disorders, especially among women, it's an easy correlation.
> Do you perhaps see the irony in trying to defend children seeing sexual material by immediately trying to justify and okay sexual dominance based on animal behavior?
I'm just pointing the US is full of liberal theories, yet awfully prude... well, unless it's about homosexuality, where it's OK for young children to witness sexually explicit behaviors (if not total depravity and including fetishist and BDSM exposure) during pride events, but that's another debate altogether. You don't have to be 18 to know very well how babies are made.
For fuck say, you can't even say "fuck" on TV!
> There’s lots of sexual predation among animals. Doesn’t mean I want that for myself or my family. Again, only proving my point by the way you speak about it.
It's actually all the same pattern in mammals, female are more likely to give it to confident male (often expressed through the dark triad, machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) than beta cucks - I stopped counting the number of hardcore feminist who ended up on their knees, asking, sorry begging to be used. It's almost getting boring.
> You fail the gom jabbar.
Actually, I'm getting off just thinking about it !
Before commenting back, try looking into that place where you dare not look! You'll find me there, staring out at you. [...] I remember your gom jabbar, now you'll remember mine. I can kill with a word.
(FWIW, I didn't bother impressing the karat moonlighter even though I was interviewing for a senior position, including 4 years on crypto backend stuff...)
They will, and they will fuck/get fucked too. This is called life.
Yes, please. Maybe Apple-fanboy here will finally understand Apple's evilness.
Lowering working pressure does not increase CFM, pump have a fixed displacement at their most efficient RPM, it's not gonna change...