3,046 karma · joined March 15, 2013
http://guavaduck.com/
[0] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/loaf#Etymology_1
[1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Reconstructed_term...
When this article came out a few months ago I was surprised it got so much press. If I'd had any idea it would get so much attention (and merit a paper in Nature) I would have pushed for us to do it :) The authors did a great job doing the experiment and addressing the possible systematics--doing torsion balance experiments the right way is difficult--but there doesn't seem to be anything too new here.
[0] https://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/
[1] https://www.washington.edu/news/2020/09/10/four-uw-professor...
[0] https://www.aroma-housewares.com/kitchen/appliances/MTC-8016...
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20643052
In Thai it's known as hemorrhagic fever, but unlike in English, where "hemorrhagic" is a technical term where the meaning isn't clear or is softened, in Thai it's just three simple Thai words: ไข้เลือดออก, "fever [that makes] blood [come] out". Luckily I didn't have any hemorrhaging.
The author considers environmental gravitational noise, but you have to also consider that any movement of the instrument in a non-uniform gravitational field will create a signal. If you consider Earth as a perfect sphere, the gravitational signal of a B-2 that the author considers is equivalent to the change in gravity from a vertical displacement of 0.2nm. This is about the size of a water molecule. Vertical stability at that level is unachievable.
[0] https://padailypost.com/2019/02/16/engineering-student-found...
You have reached the required standard, but we are unable to offer you a job immediately. We have placed you on a reserve list from which future appointments may be made.
When I was leaving academia it took a number of rejections before I realized that I wasn't being rejected because I wasn't qualified, but because the company only had one spot and I wasn't their top choice.
What he actually said was "efficient" not "cost effective".
(3140km/27km)^.6 * $4.75B = $82B. Adjusting for inflation gives you something a bit over the $100B. They probably came up with the number in a similar fashion.
Do you know if your number includes the detectors? They would have contributed significantly to the total cost.
Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.