Fuzzy logic rice cookers (2016)
fivethirtyeight.com
fivethirtyeight.com
Mine cooks white rice and brown rice perfectly, although I am supposed to soak the brown rice first (though it's still fine even if I don't). I suppose the only real improvement between my model and the new ones is that perhaps the rice cooker will soak the rice for you.
You can vary the amount of water to play with different textures, but once you have it dialed in, it's pretty hands-off.
I feel that these manufacturers try to pass off the new-and-shiny only because they have to. The old models last forever. In fact, the only reason why my last rice cooker broke is because gunk got stuck in the switch and it was not able to turn off automatically. In all other respects, the design is as simple and elegant as can be. A single circuit controlling a heating element, which automatically shuts off once a certain temperature threshold is reached.
Lastly, for those with one of those fuzzy-logic rice cookers, can you make scorched rice (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scorched_rice)? I didn't think so :)
> Rice made in the Neuro Fuzzy can seem like a work of art: firm, slender, intact, and milky white. Each grain plumps nicely without bursting and doesn’t seem to break when scooped out of the pot. In our tests, the Neuro Fuzzy was one of the few machines that made sushi rice, brown rice, and long-grain rice all taste great. Of all the machines we tested, this model produced the best basmati, cooking it up light and fluffy. By comparison, our upgrade pick, the Cuckoo CRP-G1015F, made overly moist long-grain white rice.
* https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-best-rice-cooker/
The main complaint is that it took longer than most other models.
They also have a US$ 45 budget pick. America's Test Kitchen / Cook’s Illustrated also has a preferred model (Aroma):
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uABJWCGrFPo
It's also worth considering whether just getting a multicooker (aka Instant Pot) may be the better option. Given it can also do pressure cooking and act as a slow cooker, the latest models are pretty good jack-of-all trades:
[0] https://www.aroma-housewares.com/kitchen/appliances/MTC-8016...
Why does this model take longer than other brands/models?
Is it doing something special with its neuro fuzzy logic?
However, I have always been told not to keep rice in the rice cooker for days at a time, for health reasons. If it's warm, I'd imagine it's an even better environment for bacterial/spore growth.
IIRC, the reason Zojirushi gives for not keeping rice warm for too long is that it will get yellow and hard. I don't think they mentioned food safety concerns. Mine does have a small vent hole, so I guess the moisture must escape eventually.
I use the keep warm setting on a rice cooker for another reason: To make black garlic. Take 20 bulbs of good quality garlic, put it in the rice cooker, set it on "keep warm" (NOT cook!) for two weeks without opening the lid. Note the rice cooker will be useless for anything else after this because you'll never get rid of the ingrained garlic smell.
Edit: Of course my random pot can make Persian-style crunchy rice too... :)
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-05-uk-rice-breaches-limi...
however
"the predicted lifetime cancer risk is 34 cases/million for white rice, compared with 5.4 cases/million for brown rice" where "higher risk associated with white rice is primarily a function of the higher consumption of this product."
"the predicted lifetime cancer risk from consuming one serving per day of white basmati rice is 82 cases per million, while the predicted cancer risk from consuming one serving per day of brown basmati rice is 139 cases per million."
so your mileage may vary
https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Arsenic-in-Rice-and...
To be honest this is more a hearkening back to the 90s retro take on The Beloved Old Fuzzy Logic of yesteryear and ignoring it's rot of irrelevance than any actual evaluation of the technology... "The smartest appliance I have ever owned". A spring and a magnet do almost as well.
If I remember correctly, and I may not, fuzzy logic fell out of mathematical interest when it was proved all fuzzy logic statements can be converted into conventional logic statements without loss, by adding some additional terms representing various ranges of values, e.g., if we have a sensor $T that senses the temperature in a range from 0.0 - 1.0, the fuzzy statement
if $T > .6 then TurnOffBurner else TurnOnBurner
can be converted to the conventional-logic statements $TAbove0.6 -> TurnOffBurner
$TBelow0.6 -> TurnOnBurner
With the obvious mapping of what the two values on the left are.Proving that the entire logic can be so converted is less trivial as the statements interact but IIRC it was done.
The whole hype of fuzzy logic is, well, how it was presented in this article, that it could somehow deal with the real world better than conventional logic. The proof that there was nothing it could say that conventional logic couldn't ended that conclusively.
However, it can still be a useful "programming API", for obvious reasons. But then, you don't really need a specialized "fuzzy logic" necessarily, for a lot of tasks, a big set of if statements based on non-boolean values (which, you know, are easy to come by in programming languages) does the same job. While expressing it directly in fuzzy logic might open up some mathematical analysis possibilities, expressing it in conventional programming languages opens up a lot of software engineering possibilities, so shrug. This is just another expression of the decades-long and ongoing arguments about how mathematical programming really is.
Mathematicians have continued to make hay with the family of "monotone measures", of which probability, fuzzy logic, belief functions and so on are particular members.
That I can express a problem geometrically or algebraically doesn't make one of them less useful or inspiring.
And it's a terrible marketing term. If it had been called "continuum logic" instead, there'd probably be much less disdain.
Names matter.
The principle is clever: liquids at boiling point stay at boiling point, since any additional heat energy is used to change their state from liquid to gas. When the temperature does rise above 100°C, that means there is no liquid left in the cooker, and so rice must be done. It then switches off the high heat and runs in "warm" mode.
That's not to say high-end rice cookers aren't worth it, there's a world of difference between a $100 and $500 rice cooker. Not sure how best to explain this, but rice from a cheap cooker looks and feels like a dense, gooey chunk, whereas rice from a high-end cooker forms a complex, airy 3D structure with a distinctive sheen; individual grains still retain their shape, and there's ample space between them resulting in a well-defined but light texture.
Luckily, not sold where I am, so it's not even an option :)
$200 supports IH heater for efficient heating (Efficiency is important because japanese outlet is max 1500W). $300 supports IH and pressuring.
Generally high power is considered to important for Japanese people to make delicious rice, I highly recommend it if it's affordable.
Pressuring is a bit controversial because some people not like softer rice, so some maker (Mitsubishi) still make high-end rice cooker without pressuring.
It's interesting to me that while Japanese design is generally very much appreciated and admired in the west, there are some areas where their design just doesn't translate to western aesthetics — and, at least to an outsider's perspective, seems almost an antithesis to the idea of Japanese design.
I'm thinking also of the recent article [2] about Japanese web design.
1: http://www.zojirushi.com/app/product/nszcc
2: https://randomwire.com/why-japanese-web-design-is-so-differe...
But in space-constrained Japan, easy to clean white plastic is standard and the hydrocephalic robot look (like the example you link to) considered high-tech.
"In my current fuzzy-logic cooker, however, I tell the machine what kind of rice I’m using and how long it has been soaking. It takes that information and decides what temperature it should reach, and for how long. Generally using what are essentially if/then statements, it can fine-tune the process. For example, it can take into account the surrounding air temperature and turn the heating element up or down to compensate."
At best, that's a rules engine. Nothing fuzzy.
It is a rule engine, with fuzzy rules.
The advantage is that it's easy to express vague rules in a clear way: "if the rice is too hot, stop the heater", vs "if sensor a > 0.44 and sensor b < 3.19 and sensor c >= 0.33 ...".
It disentangles the rules operating on linguistic variables from the functions which express those values.
Is my thermostat a fuzzy-logic air conditioner?
No. The point is not that a variable can take many distinct values, it's that it may have multiple values with differing degrees of membership.
"John's height is 178cm" is a crisp statement. It comes from a crisply measurable domain, being length. I can verify if it's true or false, to a given level of precision.
"John is medium tall height" is not a crisp statement. It represents that John is partly "medium" and partly "tall", at the same time.
For example, the weight sensor can deduce that water is evaporating from the bowl of rice (because the weight is gradually lifting), but it doesn't exactly know how much weight is rice and how much of it is water until near the end.
Either way, I came to the comments to see if anyone is explaining how it uses/applies fuzzy logic.
They are also very good at reheating all kinds of bread, in a way that you simply can't achieve in a conventional oven.
Just stick your baguette or whatever in there, sprinkle a bit of water at the bottom if you want (not on the bread), and hit the cook button. When the rice cooker says it's done, you get back the most amazing reheated bread.
One of my Zojirushi rice cookers is also a mochi maker (BS-ED10-WA). Fresh mochi in the morning is fantastic. You have to be able to buy the special mochi rice - I once tried English pudding rice but it didn't work.
TL;DR: The differences are detectable but not huge. If you eat plenty of rice, it's plausibly worth the upgrade but it's not life changing.
I've been looking at getting one and the info varies, even the official one for the same model! I can do it on a stove top, not an issue, just wanted to kill two birds with one stone.
Also, while at it - any opinions on the pressure cooking mode in NP-NWC/NVC models? Looks tempting... but gimmicky at the same time.
It's basically the same as cooking white rice, although it takes a bit more water. Do a batch or two as an experiment.
Cook it like it's white rice, and if it comes out too dry, experiment with adding a bit more water next time you cook it. Eventually you will figure out the ideal water line for your taste preferences. You just have to remember it!
Meanwhile I nearly electrocuted myself with a cheap one off amazon.
Next: my 10kg plastic asvel rice dispenser. “Indispensable”.