346 karma · joined June 24, 2010
Of course their priorities may be off and they could be open to be persuaded to work in a different direction. But I don't think that condescension would be very effective for that.
http://www.witricity.com/pdfs/highly-resonant-power-transfer...
Though the FT process is quite bad from a CO2 emissions POV.
It's a big difference: 1000 * 1000 would require 1000000 stones if done with the "Ehiopian algorithm", but it can be done with less than 1000 stones by using normal binary multiplication.
Maxwell "invented" the displacement current:
- Ion thrusters are way simpler and they are trying to do something that is much easier.
- Ion thrusters are relatively mature, working "fusors" don't exist.
- Existing machines that are trying to get fusion breakeven are building-sized.
- Trying to start a fusion reaction is hard, it only makes sense if you get a commensurate result (energy gain).
In the long run, I'm very optimistic about fusion.
I'm quite optimistic about magnetized inertial fusion. But the idea of doing the job much better than the Z-machine, with something lightweight enough to carry into space and in less than 10 years seems to me... unlikely, to put it mildly.
0.5 * thrust * velocity = 0.5 * (0.1 m/s^2 * 1000 kg) * 30 km/s = 0.5 * 100 N * 3E4 m/s = 150E4 W = 1.5 MW
of power.
It's not completely unreasonable: they need to validate the computational models that are used to check if an aged nuclear weapon will explode.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_zero#Very_low_temperat...
http://www.eso.org/public/archives/releases/sciencepapers/es...