matz1

More likely developer will stick around longer because they don't have to do annoying work.

Likewise imagine living in a world where you are forced to do work where its not economically worth it, thats really sucks.

Competition doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the amount of information. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/competition

Not only that, there is one more thing to carry when you go out and impairment of social interaction because of lack of facial expression.

The problem is wearing mask is annoying and uncomfortable. If I have to choose, I'll choose the increased risk of covid all the time rather than wearing mask.

I think so and it probably will require some skills to fully utilize it where kids in the future will start learning to use it from the early age.

I image this is how I probably will become 'obsolete' in regards of technology just like my parent can't catch up with todays technology.

>Having an affair is always going to be something people prefer to keep secret

My point is it doesn't have to. Ask what is it that makes people prefer to keep secret then fix that instead.

Not saying its going to be easy but at least we should spend the effort on fixing that, instead of spending the effort on hiding the information.

>society will still have its own opinions.

So we need to spend the effort on minimizing the misery caused by that

>you can’t be blackmailed for doing weed if nobody cares you did weed

This is imo the most feasible/pragmatic approach for privacy issue.

Instead fixing it by hiding the information, we should fix the actual issue that cause misery when the information is public.

um most people, including me, like to see beautiful people. It make sense to suppress post by the ugly.

Every hiring is a discrimination in some way.

I can only speak for myself. I don't eat dog/monkey i think it because my upbringing/culture thus it create disgusting feeling in my brain.

I have no problem with pigs because I've used to it since childhood and i find it delicious. It has nothing to do with it being intelligent/emotional.

I wouldn't, like I wouldn't eat dog/monkey even though its socially acceptable in certain place, in my mind its disgusting. Pig on the other hand its delicious.

Not everyone want that, if I need my own private space I don't need to go to office.

The reason I may want to go to office is to see my coworkers.

Doors/private cubicle defeat the purpose.

Not sure why my morality has to change, doesn't matter if pig turn out to have conscious experience like mine, I will still eat it.

>there's already legal ways to deal with it

suing can cost money, time, effort, and may not able to necessarily clear your name even if you won.

What are you going to do ? Just believe it ?

> Imagine a letter like this targeted at you one day, except unlike Mr. Pretty, you are innocent.

You already assume he is guilty ?

What value to add to criticize this specific case?

Whether they use "unable" or "choose not too" shouldn't matter.

Just treat it the same.

Hell, I would happy if self driving cars only kills 1.5 (slightly more) million people each car.

>What does training look like?

The same way how human learn/train.

Observe how most people behave then imitate.

This is why travel restrictions or “essential workers" designation are ridiculous.

It doesn't help, only mostly cause misery.

Its not deceptive/contradictory, technically, close to level 5 can be level 2.

I disagree that its deceptive. Technically yes the car can drive itself albeit not perfect. Tesla never claim it can drive perfectly either.

Car company can't do that because there are law to prevent that.

What law tesla broke in this case?

To create believe is basically the goal of every marketing campaign of any kind. Thats expected and reasonable.

>You can't tell someone their car has full self driving capabilities and then expect them to listen when you tell them that they also have to be paying attention 100% of the time

So its Tesla fault if people doesn't listen?

To me even 90 days is insane, at least in Indonesia, you could open an ice cream shop tomorrow in your own house if you would like

>Are you also actively working with other people/companies who might hire those same people to put caps on what they might get paid, or indeed to negotiate hiring them at all? Google/apple/etc have enormous sway in some areas re: hiring/referrals/etc, and engaged in 'antipoaching' stuff that prevented free movement of labor (imo).

If I have the ability/resource to do that and if the total cost is less then of course.

I can easily afford to pay my mechanic twice the money. Of course just like google, I don't want to.

To make driving more relaxing.

Instead of actively driving you switch to be a driving supervisor instead.

Think about it as a really advance cruise control.

Autopilot doesn't mean it won't crash, thats absurd.