2,184 karma · joined May 21, 2010
The house...
I'm still working on recommendations. There are suggestions once you follow someone. It's a good way to get started, but the best way to get good content is to hand pick folk based on what they have shared.
So, basically I see self-help books as a sign that someone over-values impersonal advice. Not a sign of confidence, IMHO.
Sorry, but I have little faith that this administration will do the right thing. If Obama said what he will specifically not sign off on, then I might be a bit more optimistic.
I think one or two more simple 'take-aways' would help. I also think people want to know why a company Facebook would be against SOPA. If they understood that in the form of a simple example, that would go a long way. Everyone uses Facebook.
Really great job. Very articulate. I would have added 50 ums. :/
A few people submit their blog posts to hubski. Since people don't share feeds, it's not frowned upon.
I run http://hubski.com that was built on top of news.arc. One of the things that I did to help tie posts together was to add tags. It's not perfect, but it does help pull up similar articles. You can follow tags too. EX: http://hubski.com/tag?id=architecture
It's a tough call. HN does work for most people, I think. The maybe the potential blowback is not be worth experimentation at this point? PG seems willing to make changes, but he's conservative about it. Maybe from lessons learned?
I'm not sure that merging discussion based on topic would work, or how it would be decided.
It's a sexy beast. Performance is good. It is quiet and cool too. Battery life is fair, but I keep it plugged in most of the time.
:) Awesome. Thanks heynk. I'm still searching for the perfect title font. If have any more feedback, definitely send it along to markkat at gmail. Or, people report issues and make requests at: http://hubski.com/tag?id=bugski
And if you dig it, spread the word!
It does make it a bit easier on the eyes.
I think this one is almost more effective. Maybe a mix between the two.
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fj...
I think part of what has happened to these dwindling forums is that they are functionally out-dated, and a bit too insular. -It takes too much time for new people to get up to speed on most boards. (dont forget Hubski, btw. :))
Currently, science is funded based on individual results. You can't blame folk for wanting to be promoted or to win tenure.
Good science is slow, deliberate, and motivated by open-ended questions and discovery, not by end points.
We need to fund the process of science, and make sure that the knowledge gained is shared publicly. No other disruption is necessary.