A week ago, there was a post titled “Fastmail is having problems again”, so today, “yet again” seemed adequate:
1,038 karma · joined September 25, 2013
A week ago, there was a post titled “Fastmail is having problems again”, so today, “yet again” seemed adequate:
“Plans are worthless when the fighting is once begun, and all depends on the inspiration of the moment.” (1877)
By the way, is there any source for that blog post that proves its existence and form back to 2006? The Wayback Machine only has it until 2016, but perhaps the URL changed.
We know this from “The Lean Startup”, but practical examples can show why some aspects are important. And it’s not just small teams and solo founders from startups and young companies that may place too much importance on a great initial idea. It’s certainly also the general public, where most people belief that successful startups are the result of a genius having a clever idea. See basically every movie about inventions (and young companies). That general public also includes a lot of (potential) investors.
https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries-5/#descdef-media-prefe...
Unless I’m mistaken, the Google Play Developer Policy allows you to use a different payments provider, such as Stripe, in a case like Netflix or Spotify’s:
> Developers […] must use Google Play In-app Billing as the method of payment, except for the following cases: […] Payment is for digital content that may be consumed outside of the app itself […]
Source: https://play.google.com/intl/en/about/monetization-ads/
At least in the past, Skype has been doing exactly that, for example.
We may need reproducible builds and reproducible minification. If we want developers to audit their own dependencies, in case we deem that practical, packages cannot ship their own minified sources. Auditing the non-minified source is hard enough.
We may need (for-profit) organizations that audit packages and award their official seal which you can trust before you add or update a dependency.
We may need better standard libraries and fewer micro-packages.
Sorry to ask, but I’m not really sure I got it right: Do you think the DIY air purifier was the cause of these health problems? Or did it at least contribute by letting the mold come back (inside)?
As others have noted, a dehumidifier could help. But what prevents mold from growing inside these dehumidifiers as well? Sure, they’re mainly built from plastic and metal, so no paper as in your case. Will that be enough to prevent mold (or bacteria)?
Otherwise, a dehumidifier could turn into yet another health hazard over time.
Developing and drafting things in the open can produce the same level or even higher levels of quality.
Since the project is not a commercial product, though, I don't care what solution you use :)
So there's obviously an easy fix to the problems you outline, which are no fundamental problems.
Regarding legal expertise, I or anybody else could go through this with a lawyer next week and have a review, including a "pull request" of required changes, no more than a week later.
For the translation, of course the process was not copying and pasting words into Google Translate one by one and using the result. The translation process has been much more thorough.
The solution here is pragmatic and works. You can measure performance, if you think this is really an issue.