Fastmail is having problems again
fastmailstatus.com
fastmailstatus.com
That said, it does sound the status page could use an update: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28964509
At this point from a privacy perspective they are terrible. Not only because of Taliban style Aussie privacy laws but their system too is anti-privacy.
FM system automatically creates contact lists from all emails, automatically backs up deleted emails, drafts etc. You have no control on this and is ideal for govt data mining and social graph generation. Sure they say it is for your benefit but then allow me to turn it off. Given people regularly get home police visits in Australia for Facebook posts and overall police state climate does not help.
So time to stay clear of FM. They want you to pay money so their govt can trawl through your email and possibly impersonate you if need arises. No thanks, I can get that at Google.
Tutanota and Mailbox.org have superior offering with encryption at rest. Tuta has clients for all platforms with client device based crypto.
Otherwise I've been super happy with them.
A different client is definitely the fallback, though I haven't found a great one of those either. Granted it's been ~6 years since I last searched.
Open to suggestions!
Because on Mail.app (iOS/Mac) if you want to reply from that random-email-addr-smjgg@ you have to first add that in "Email Address" for that account in Settings. I am trying to find an app that does it (my mail provider is not fastmail, it's mailbox).
Lack of this feature makes full use of catch-all very unintuitive.
For new messages you still need an extension like Identity Chooser or to manually edit the from header before sending.
it has consistently been fastmail in the past, and i have had a great time with them over the last three years, but it's always nice to know what else is out there.
for better or worse i've also come to use fastmail for dns management (tolerable) and even for http hosting (awful, but occasionally convenient).
And seems appropriate if FastMail is having DDoS issues.
I would much prefer multiple smaller companies that do one thing well, than a monolith that, even assuming they did everything well, has complete control over our digital lives.
https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-email-routing/
https://www.cloudflare.com/email-forwarding-waitlist-sign-up...
Spoke to someone who switched and said that his sent emails were ending up in Spam initially for others - could even be related to other servers but that it eventually mitigated itself and he is quite happy with the service.
It may not have better uptime than Fastmail or Gmail but it's also very unlikely to ever come under focused attack.
There's a certain resiliency in having a lot of small entities doing the same thing, compared to a handful of gargantuan ones that can take down huge user populations in an instant.
It's being delivered into the inbox that is an issue. You can eventually get there with a good IP and time but it's best to farm it out - plenty of services out there for it.
I've been doing that for decades.
I had some deliverability issues back in the early aughts, but I haven't had issues for many years.
Over the past decade or so, SPF/DKIM/DMARC and not running an open relay (not that I ever did that) has kept deliverability very good for me.
That said, none of the IP addresses I've used are on consumer ISP ranges. That may have an impact too.
And anything else you'd mention as a con? I'm trying to remember why I didn't put them on my short list, maybe it was the 2FA thing, but I think there was something else.
I like mailfence for several reasons. Quick, at personal support is one important factor.
However I do think it would suit any provider if they publicized an annotated downtown log, so that we didn't have to guess how often or why they had issues.
I had been using my ISP's email for imap connectivity from my home and phone.
They are getting out of the business of supplying the circuit I have with them and am now moving away from that ISP.
I chose to host my own email (I already owned my own domains and hosted my own MTA for those domains) on a local imap server. Heck, I even host my own authoritative DNS zones.
While there are single point of failure modes with that, nothing I do with my personal domains would kill me if my (multiple) ISP links are down for a few days.
Not the solution for everyone, but it works for me.
I have not really used them, although I have their cheapest account hanging around. Not able to make a recommendation, but maybe someone else can comment.
They offer a bunch of extra stuff like cloud, video conferencing, calendar etc. but I’ve never touched it.
In my opinion the interface is terrible and the settings are not so user friendly, in the settings menu is a kinda sub-settings menu which seems to be embedded from a subsystem…? But if you’ve got everything setup and provided you’re using your own email client, the service is top notch.
Never had a problem, maintenance and stuff like this was always communicated clearly and early. They split the parent company behind mailbox.org into its own one and even this one was very nice communicated.
I’d love to try providers like Purelymail because I think 30€ per year for my few mails is a bit overkill but the money is well spent on people knowing what they are doing and most important, the servers are all hosted in Germany.
YMMV but I’m happy with them and would definitely recommend them!
For basics they are fine. Their cheapest plan is not the old cheapest. They added some new plans and now on cheapest plan there's literally no support (not even email or ticket) and many features simply cut off - no personal domain either.
IMHO one must not consider a paid email provider if it doesn't support custom domain, no matter how cheap that plan is.
UX is pathetic and there's no sign of that being fixed.
If you just need to receive and send occasional email at your domain however, iCloud+ may be sufficient and you may already be paying for it.
https://therecord.media/ddos-attacks-hit-multiple-email-prov...
$ dig truthsocial.com MX
truthsocial.com. 3600 IN MX 10 in1-smtp.messagingengine.com.
truthsocial.com. 3600 IN MX 20 in2-smtp.messagingengine.com.
People: your collateral damage is quite high, can you cut it out please.Really easy, and costs me very little to do (CloudFlare is my registrar; Fastmail my email host). Highly recommend you buy a domain for email. Looks professional, too.
An Njal.la hosted domain was successfully transferred to Namecheap (through no fault of Njal.la). Obviously, this is very rare and extremley targeted.
[1] https://registrarsec.com/ [2] https://www.vice.com/en/article/qj8833/dark-fail-fake-court-...
The way around this is that they let you do alias+something@domain.com, or for sites that won't accept a plus address, alias@something.domain.com. This works very well for me, although I get funny looks when some vendor asks me for an email address and I give them e.g. alias@your_company.domain.com. Especially fun when you end up having to spell it out while the clerk eyeballs you like you're trying to screw with them.
I started doing this thinking it would let me identify who was selling/leaking emails to spammers. I now have a lot of unique email addresses like this, one per vendor. Fastmail is either excellent at filtering spam without me ever seeing it, or vendors just aren't selling/leaking my address(es); the only 'vendor' that I'm sure distributed my address after 3+ years is a state government entity.
It looks like all tiers can do 600 + 15 per user; I don't remember if it's always been like this, but I was pretty sure there was a limit.
Looks like a subtle difference between alias, with its outbound identity, and catchall inbound.
This was a great feature of Fastmail but it isn't portable as many other mail providers don't support it. So if you think you might want to switch in the future, keep it in mind, the + addressing is easier to migrate to other providers.
Your answer makes no sense, DNS are decentralised!
Someone have forgotten Facebook's outage.If I recall correctly, it was their DNS servers that did that in a convoluted kind of way but not because of DNS as such. Due to some connection error or another the servers that also run DNS ordered the routers to withdraw the BGP routes to all Facebook properties which in turn killed access to said DNS servers.
If you’re having major network problems, there’s a good chance your DNS server will go down too, which would more than likely take down your subdomain as well.
For example, with Facebook's recent outage, because they hosted their status page on the same DNS server as their regular service, they weren't able to communicate the outage on their status page.