> I’m also interested in taking Reshaped further by introducing more complex, opinionated premium components on top of the core library. Not “50 landing page layouts,” but advanced components that require sophisticated CSS and React logic.
214 karma · joined February 18, 2014
> I’m also interested in taking Reshaped further by introducing more complex, opinionated premium components on top of the core library. Not “50 landing page layouts,” but advanced components that require sophisticated CSS and React logic.
I’ve wanted to switch to an open alternative to Operator Mono for a long time now, and I think because of the mix and match, this finally is the one.
I like wearing flashy clothes myself, and I would even say it has proven advantageous to cooperation in my line of work, so I was curious about this article. However, nowhere is it stated that flashy clothes make people less likely to cooperate with you. They say wearing clothes with luxury logos and signal high status does.
My biggest issue was (maybe still is, I quit using Firefox last year) is that on wide color gamut displays, like every MacBook Pro, it renders colors completely wrong. So it would render literally every website, save black and white website, completely incorrectly.
My main browser these days is Safari (so I’m still enjoying a lot of browser bugs). When I really need something to work or need specific de tools I switch to Chrome. For me Firefox is in a middle ground between those two browsers, resulting in me never actually using it anymore.
In the case of NFTs I can just download any NFT myself and show off with it. It's like everyone being able to show off a hat in TF2, but the people having paid only have the advantage they can boast in chat about the fact they paid for something available to everyone.
For example, the Rijksmuseum: https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/en/rijksstudio
However, there’s Firefox which only supports sRGB, but then displays everything in WCG completely over saturating every single colored pixel on a website [1]. The only way to get your website to look the way you intended it on Firefox is to make the whole thing black and white.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/dloon6/solving_fir...
I have also seen the horrible half/half implementations you mention where it should have just been implemented on the server side, and I totally agree with you there.
However it was just an example to show that a unsubstantiated blanket statement like “responsiveness never” is just wrong. I’m not saying doing search in JS is always (or even often) better, but it can be sometimes if done well.
In this case the search is instant. Without JS you would have to have a submit button and wait for the request. Even if you also added a button the JS version it would still feel more responsive, as again, you're not waiting for the request.
[1] https://www.w3schools.com/howto/tryit.asp?filename=tryhow_js...
Without javascript the second tab would be a link to another HTML page where the second tab is shown. Exact same behaviour for the user, however the one with a few lines of javascript will feel way more responsive than the one without, where the user has to wait for a new page to load.
[1] https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/components/navs/#javascrip...
For the author: There's no console error either though (which is normally the case when there's issues with audio permissions, often an issue in Safari), so I'm not sure what's wrong.